Cited by 68Endometriosis Research and TreatmentGynecological conditions and treatmentsEctopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management

A pilot study to evaluate the relative efficacy of endometrial biopsy and full curettage in making a diagnosis of endometriosis by the detection of endometrial nerve fibers

Al-Jefout, Moamar, Andreadis, Natasha, Tokushige, Natsuko, Markham, Robert, Fraser, Ian·2007·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective The purpose of this study was to evaluate endometrial biopsy and curettage in detecting small nerve fibers in eutopic endometrium for diagnosis of endometriosis. Study design Endometrial biopsies with precise, consistent technique and curettings were taken from 37 women (20 with endometriosis and 17 without endometriosis). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value were formally calculated. Endometrial nerve fibers were immunohistochemically detected using the pan-neuronal marker PGP9.5. Results Small nerve fibers were detected in all endometrial biopsies and curettings from all 20 women with endometriosis, but were not detected in endometrium taken from 17 women without endometriosis. Mean (+/-SD) nerve fiber density in the endometrial biopsies was 26.8 per mm(2) +/- 55.9 (range, 1.6-125) and for curettings was 21.6 per mm(2) +/- 33.1 (range, 0.8-250), with 100% specificity, sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive value. Conclusion Careful endometrial biopsy combined with immunohistochemical staining for nerve fibers may be a reliable means of diagnosing or excluding endometriosis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.032

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women with endometriosis who undergo endometrial biopsy or hysterectomy have more nerve fibers in the endometrium and myometrium than other women and than women with endometriosis using hormonal treatments.

    “An increase of nerve fibers in the endometrium and myometrium was observed in women with endometriosis undergoing endometrial biopsy or hysterectomy compared with other women and women with endometriosis using hormonal treatments”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Al-Jefout, M., Andreadis, N., Tokushige, N., Markham, R., & Fraser, I.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
197
Issue
6
Pages
578.e1-578.e4
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977140365
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCLA - Biblioteca de Ciencias de la Salud (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ectopic Pregnancy Diagnosis and Management
Keywords
endometriosis diagnosis, endometrial biopsy, curettage, PGP 9.5, immunohistochemistry, nerve fiber density, sensitivity and specificity, eutopic endometrium
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Curettage, Endometriosis, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Pilot Projects, Treatment Outcome, Nerve Fibers, Unmyelinated

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review