Cited by 141Algal biology and biofuel productionAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsAquaculture Nutrition and Growth

Heterotrophic vs autotrophic production of microalgae: bringing some light into the everlasting cost controversy

Open access
Ruiz, Jesús, Wijffels, Rene H., Dominguez, Manuel, Barbosa, Maria J.·2022·Algal Research

Abstract

Heterotrophic or autotrophic? This is the continuous question the industry faces when microalgae production is the endeavor. Surprisingly, nowadays specialists have not reached a consensus on which is the most economical option. The current work analyses costs for heterotrophic and autotrophic cultivation of microalgae at an industrial scale. Heterotrophic cultivation of microalgae results in a production cost of 4.00 €·kg−1 of dry weight as a centrifuged paste. This is within the range of autotrophic costs, but still above the production cost in some photobioreactors. The study also identifies the current limitations on the technology and studies the effect on the cost of overcoming these. Once achieved, the advances in the process could result in a heterotrophic production cost reduced to 1.08 €·kg−1. Autotrophic cultivation seems competitive with heterotrophic production. It is time to leap forward in the autotrophic production scale to achieve the critical reduction in production cost.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.algal.2022.102698

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Heterotrophic cultivation is a technically robust and increasingly relevant industrial alternative when considering productivity, scalability, and global applicability.

    “Even so, when viewed from a broader perspective that considers productivity, scalability, and global applicability, heterotrophic cultivation emerges as a technically robust and increasingly relevant industrial alternative (Ruiz et al., 2022).”

    From Microalgae biotechnology and its role in sustainable and healthy food design (2025) · cites this paper as Ruiz et al., 2022

    The Introduction reports high heterotrophic productivities, and section 3.1 describes existing large-scale fermenters, supporting its potential as an industrial alternative. But section 3.5 says a substantial improvement is still needed to overcome limits on industrial production and develop a robust strain; it also says autotrophic production predominates worldwide. The paper therefore does not establish that heterotrophic cultivation is already technically robust or increasingly applicable globally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Y. Chisti, Raceways-based production of algal crude oil, in: C. Posten, C. Walter (Eds.), Microalgal Biotechnol. Potential Prod, Walter de Gruyter, 2013, pp. 113-144 (accessed February 18, 2019), https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/ green.2013.3.issue-3-4/green-2013-0018/green-2013-0018.xml.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruiz, J., Wijffels, R. H., Dominguez, M., & Barbosa, M. J.
Affiliations
Universidad de Cádiz (ES)
Corresponding author
Ruiz, Jesús
Venue
Algal Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-05
Volume
64
Pages
102698
ISSN
2211-9264 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224077039
Cited by
141
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 8
FWCI
5.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Algal Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RODIN (Universidad de Cádiz) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • H2020 (745754)
  • European Research Council
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, heterotrophic cultivation, autotrophic cultivation, production costs, cost analysis, industrial scale, photobioreactors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review