Cited by 177Sustainable Supply Chain ManagementExtraction and Separation ProcessesSupply Chain and Inventory Management

Cost-effective supply chain for electric vehicle battery remanufacturing

Li, Lin, Dababneh, Fadwa, Zhao, Jing·2018·Applied Energy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.05.115

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, L., Dababneh, F., & Zhao, J.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Li, Lin
Venue
Applied Energy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-09
Volume
226
Pages
277-286
ISSN
0306-2619 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2806693439
Cited by
177
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 1
FWCI
17.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Energy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Extraction and Separation Processes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
Keywords
electric vehicle batteries, lithium-ion batteries, battery remanufacturing, closed-loop supply chain, end-of-life batteries, supply chain network optimization, sensitivity analysis, sustainable supply chain management, battery recycling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review