Cited by 113Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBiofuel production and bioconversion

An evaluation of the global potential of bioenergy production on degraded lands

Open access
Nijsen, Michiel, Smeets, Edward, Stehfest, Elke, van Vuuren, Detlef P.·2012·GCB Bioenergy

Abstract

Abstract In this article the global potential of energy crop production on degraded lands was estimated using detailed, spatially explicit data about the area, type and extent of degradation derived from the Global Assessment of Land Degradation Dataset, and by combining this dataset with various spatially explicit data sets. Next, an estimate was made of the possible yield of perennial energy crops on the degraded areas as a function of the type and degree of degradation. Lightly degraded areas were not included, as these areas might be suitable for conventional food production. The total global potential energy production on degraded lands was assessed to be slightly above 150 and 190 EJ yr−1, for grassy and woody energy crops, respectively. Most of this potential, however, is on areas currently classified as forest, cropland or pastoral land, leaving a potential of around 25 and 32 EJ yr−1 on other land cover categories. Most of the potential energy crop production on degraded land is located in developing regions. China has a total potential of 30 EJ yr−1, of which 4 EJ yr−1 from areas classified as other land. Also USA, Brazil, West Africa, East Africa, Russia and India have substantial potentials of 12–18 EJ yr−1, with up to 30% of the potential from areas classified as other land.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01121.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most seminal efforts have focused on soil degradation, while more recent efforts have investigated the broader issue of land degradation from an ecosystem approach, which encompasses both soils and vegetation.

    “Finally, while most seminal efforts have focused on soil degradation (Nijsen et al., 2012;Oldeman et al., 1990), more recent efforts have investigated the broader issue of land degradation from an ecosystem approach, which encompasses both soils and vegetation.”

    From Mapping the world's degraded lands (2015) · cites this paper as Nijsen et al., 2012

  • The Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD) was the first attempt to map human-induced degradation around the world and is still used today.

    “The Global Assessment of Soil Degradation (GLASOD) commissioned by the United Nations Environment Program was the first attempt to map human-induced degradation around the world (Oldeman, 1994;Oldeman et al., 1990) and is still used today (e.g., Nijsen et al., 2012).”

    From Mapping the world's degraded lands (2015) · cites this paper as Nijsen et al., 2012

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Alcamo J, Leemans R, Kreileman E (1998) Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century: Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model. Pergamon and Elsevier Science, London.
  2. Crosson P (1997) The on-farm economic costs of soil erosion. In: Advances in Soil Sci- ence: Methods for Assessment of Soil Degradation (eds Lal R, Blum W H, Valentine C, Stewart BA), pp. 495-511. CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York.
  3. Hakansson I, Voorhees WB (1997) Soil compaction. In: Advances in Soil Science: Meth- ods for Assessment of Soil Degradation (eds Lal R, Blum WH, Valentine C, Stewart BA), pp. 495-511. CRC Press, Boca Raton, New York.
  4. Reich P, Eswaran H, Beinroth F (2001) Global dimensions of vulnerability to wind and water erosion. In: Sustaining the Global Farm (eds Stott DE, Mohtar RH, Stein- hardt GC), pp. 838-846. International Soil Conservation Organization, West Lafayette.
  5. Samson RA, Omielan JA (1994) Switchgrass: a potential biomass energy crop for eth- anol production. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth North American Prairie Conference (eds Wickett RG, Lewis PD, Woodliffe A), pp. 253-258.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nijsen, M., Smeets, E., Stehfest, E., & van Vuuren, D. P.
Affiliations
  • Utrecht University (NL)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (NL)
  • Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan 9 3721 MA Bilthoven The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Stehfest, Elke
Venue
GCB Bioenergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
4
Issue
2
Pages
130-147
ISSN
  • 1757-1693 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-1707
OpenAlex
W2142414813
Cited by
113
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
19.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • GCB Bioenergy (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Planbureau voor de Leefomgeving
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanics of Materials › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
bioenergy potential, degraded land, energy crops, land degradation, perennial crops, energy yield prediction, land cover, developing regions, China

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review