Cited by 131Physical Activity and HealthSchizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health Research Topics

Selection, Use and Psychometric Properties of Physical Activity Measures to Assess Individuals with Severe Mental Illness: A Narrative Synthesis

Open access
Soundy, Andrew, Roskell, Carolyn, Stubbs, Brendon, Vancampfort, Davy·2014·Archives of Psychiatric Nursing

Abstract

This research provides a critical consideration of the outcome measures used to assess physical activity in individuals with severe mental illness. A narrative synthesis was utilised to provide a simple juxtapose of the current research. A sensitive topic-based search strategy was conducted in order to identify studies that met the eligibility criteria. Fifty two studies met the inclusion criteria and 5 were identified specially as validation studies. The current research identified several methodological shortcomings. The justification and choice of outcome measure used is often weak and only five studies have validated a specific outcome measure of physical activity. Within these validation studies, the validation process often lacked a consideration of agreement between measures. Accelerometers have been most frequently used as a criterion measure, notably the RT3 tri-axial accelerometer. Objective based measures may be best placed to consider physical activity levels, although, methodological considerations for the utilization of such tools is required. Self-report questionnaires have benefits for use in this population but require further validation. Researchers and clinicians need to carefully consider what outcome measure they are using and be aware of the development, scope and purpose of that measure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.apnu.2013.12.002

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soundy, A., Roskell, C., Stubbs, B., & Vancampfort, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
Venue
Archives of Psychiatric Nursing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-04
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
135-151
ISSN
0883-9417 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1978678949
Cited by
131
References
7
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 3
FWCI
8.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Psychiatric Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
physical activity, severe mental illness, psychometric validation, accelerometer, self-report questionnaire, measurement agreement
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Motor Activity, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Narration, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review