Cited by 423Digital Communication and LanguageSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Connecting developmental constructions to the internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms.

Subrahmanyam, Kaveri, Smahel, David, Greenfield, Patricia·2006·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The authors examined the online construction of identity and sexuality in a large sample of conversations from monitored and unmonitored teen chat rooms. More than half of the 583 participants (identified by a distinct screen name) communicated identity information, most frequently gender. In this way, participants compensated for the text-based chat environment by providing information about themselves that would be visible and obvious in face-to-face communication. Sexual themes constituted 5% of all utterances (1 sexual comment per minute); bad or obscene language constituted 3% of the sample (1 obscenity every 2 minutes). Participants who self-identified as female produced more implicit sexual communication, participants who self-identified as male produced more explicit sexual communication. The protected environment of monitored chat (hosts who enforce basic behavioral rules) contained an environment with less explicit sexuality and fewer obscenities than the freer environment of unmonitored chat. These differences were attributable both to the monitoring process itself and to the differing populations attracted to each type of chat room (monitored: more participants self-identified as younger and female; unmonitored: more participants self-identified as older and male).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.42.3.395

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D., & Greenfield, P.
Affiliations
California State University Los Angeles (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2006
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
395-406
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2159743522
Cited by
423
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 23
FWCI
20.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of North Florida Digital Commons (University of North Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-0125446:004)
  • Georgetown University
  • California State University, Los Angeles
  • Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports (VZ 0021622406)
  • Masaryk University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Digital Communication and Language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
online identity construction, adolescent sexuality, sexual exploration, online chat, gender identity disclosure, sexual communication, obscenity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Online Systems, Social Identification, Sexuality, Internet, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review