Cited by 43Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDietary Effects on Health

Selective carbohydrate or protein restriction: Effects on subsequent food intake and cravings

Coelho, Jennifer S., Polivy, Janet, Herman, C. Peter·2006·Appetite

Abstract

In order to determine the effects of selective food restriction on subsequent food intake and cravings, participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: carbohydrate-restriction, protein-restriction, or control (no restriction). Participants in the restriction conditions were asked to restrict their intake of either complex carbohydrates or animal proteins for 3 days, before coming to the laboratory for an experimental session. During the experimental session, participants' food intake, cravings, and affect were measured. The results indicated that selective food restriction resulted in selective behavioural consequences. Specifically, carbohydrate-restricted participants consumed more of a high-carbohydrate food than did controls or protein-restrictors, in addition to reporting more cravings for high-carbohydrate foods over the restriction period. Protein-restricted participants reported more cravings for high-protein foods over the restriction period, in comparison to controls and carbohydrate-restrictors; however, protein-restricted participants did not consume more of the particular high-protein food presented to them in the laboratory. The roles of dietary restraint and negative affect in influencing cravings and food intake are discussed. Overall, selective food restriction is demonstrated to have negative psychological and behavioural consequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2006.05.015

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coelho, J. S., Polivy, J., & Herman, C. P.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Coelho, Jennifer S.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-11
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
352-360
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094912351
Cited by
43
References
38
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
American Psychological Association
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
Keywords
carbohydrate restriction, protein restriction, food cravings, dietary intake, dietary restraint, negative affect, high-carbohydrate foods, protein-rich foods, eating behaviour
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Appetite, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Taste, Time Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Diet Records, Body Mass Index, Diet, Protein-Restricted, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review