Cited by 42Regulation of Appetite and ObesityNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBiochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques

Restriction of dietary protein leads to conditioned protein preference and elevated palatability of protein-containing food in rats

Open access
Murphy, Michelle, Peters, Kate Z., Denton, Bethany S., Lee, Kathryn A., Chadchankar, Heramb, McCutcheon, James E.·2018·Physiology & Behavior

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The mechanisms by which intake of dietary protein is regulated are poorly understood despite their potential involvement in determining food choice and appetite. In particular, it is unclear whether protein deficiency results in a specific appetite for protein and whether influences on diet are immediate or develop over time. To determine the effects of protein restriction on consumption, preference, and palatability for protein we assessed patterns of intake for casein (protein) and maltodextrin (carbohydrate) solutions in adult rats. To induce a state of protein restriction, rats were maintained on a low protein diet (5% casein) and compared to control rats on non-restricted diet (20% casein). Under these dietary conditions, relative to control rats, protein-restricted rats exhibited hyperphagia without weight gain. After two weeks, on alternate conditioning days, rats were given access to either isocaloric casein or maltodextrin solutions that were saccharin-sweetened and distinctly flavored whilst consumption and licking patterns were recorded. This allowed rats to learn about the post-ingestive nutritional consequences of the two different solutions. Subsequently, during a preference test when rats had access to both solutions, we found that protein-restricted rats exhibited a preference for casein over carbohydrate whereas non-restricted rats did not. Analysis of lick microstructure revealed that this preference was associated with an increase in cluster size and number, reflective of an increase in palatability. In conclusion, protein-restriction induced a conditioned preference for protein, relative to carbohydrate, and this was associated with increased palatability.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.physbeh.2017.12.011

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Protein restriction induces a specific selection for protein, marked by protein-specific increases in preference and motivation.

    “Protein restriction also induces a specific selection for protein, marked by protein-specific increases in preference and motivation”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murphy, M., Peters, K. Z., Denton, B. S., Lee, K. A., Chadchankar, H., & McCutcheon, J. E.
Affiliations
University of Leicester (GB)
Corresponding author
McCutcheon, James E.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
184
Pages
235-241
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2766105044
Cited by
42
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/M007391/1)
  • European Commission (GA 631404)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
Keywords
protein restriction, palatability, hyperphagia, casein, maltodextrin, food choice, appetite regulation, saccharin
MeSH terms
Animals, Body Weight, Energy Intake, Caseins, Conditioning, Operant, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Food Preferences, Male, Polysaccharides, Saccharin, Sweetening Agents, Taste, Time Factors, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review