Cited by 147Consumer Attitudes and Food LabelingSodium Intake and HealthNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Consumer knowledge and attitudes to salt intake and labelled salt information

Grimes, Carley A., Riddell, Lynn J., Nowson, Caryl A.·2009·Appetite

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate consumers' knowledge of health risks of high salt intake and frequency of use and understanding of labelled salt information. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in shopping centres within Metropolitan Melbourne. A sample of 493 subjects was recruited. The questionnaire assessed salt related shopping behaviours, attitudes to salt intake and health and their ability to interpret labelled sodium information. Four hundred and seventy four valid surveys were collected (65% female, 64% being the main shopper). Most participants knew of the relationship between salt intake and high blood pressure (88%). Sixty five percent of participants were unable to correctly identify the relationship between salt and sodium. Sixty nine percent reported reading the salt content of food products when shopping. Salt label usage was significantly related to shoppers concern about the amount of salt in their diet and the belief that their health could improve by lowering salt intake. Approximately half of the sample was unable to accurately use labelled sodium information to pick low salt options. Raising consumer awareness of the health risks associated with high salt consumption may increase salt label usage and purchases of low salt foods. However, for food labels to be effective in helping consumers select low salt foods a more 'user friendly' labelling format is needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2009.06.007

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grimes, C. A., Riddell, L. J., & Nowson, C. A.
Affiliations
Deakin University (AU)
Corresponding author
Nowson, Caryl A.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
189-194
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987133248
Cited by
147
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
salt intake, food labeling, consumer knowledge, consumer attitudes, hypertension, low-salt foods, food shopping behaviour, label comprehension, consumer awareness
MeSH terms
Australia, Awareness, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Food Labeling, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Risk Factors, Sodium Chloride, Dietary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review