Cited by 51Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorGambling Behavior and Treatments

Eating to live or living to eat? Exploring the causal attributions of self-perceived food addiction

Ruddock, Helen K., Dickson, Joanne M., Field, Matt, Hardman, Charlotte A.·2015·Appetite

Abstract

Previous studies indicate that many people perceive themselves to be addicted to food. However, little is known about how the concept of 'food addiction' is defined amongst members of the lay public. The current study examined beliefs about the cognitive and behavioural manifestations of food addiction. Participants (N = 210) completed an internet-delivered questionnaire in which they indicated whether or not they perceived themselves to be a food addict and provided a brief explanation for their response. Over a quarter of participants (28%) perceived themselves to be food addicts and self-diagnosis was predicted by increased BMI and younger age, but not by gender. Thematic analysis was conducted to explore the causal attributions provided by self-perceived food addicts and non-addicts. Six characteristics were identified: 1) Reward-driven eating (i.e. eating for psychological rather than physiological reasons), 2) A functional or psychological preoccupation with food, 3) A perceived lack of self-control around food, 4) Frequent food cravings, 5) Increased weight or an unhealthy diet, and 6) A problem with a specific type of food. The emergent themes, and their frequency, did not differ between self-perceived food addicts and non-addicts. However, self-perceived food addicts and non-addicts reported divergent cognitions, behaviours and attitudes within each common theme. This study is the first to provide qualitative insight into beliefs about food addiction in both self-perceived food addicts and non-addicts. The findings appear to reflect a view of food addiction that is identifiable through several core behaviours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.appet.2015.07.018

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ruddock, H. K., Dickson, J. M., Field, M., & Hardman, C. A.
Affiliations
University of Liverpool (GB)
Corresponding author
Ruddock, Helen K.
Venue
Appetite
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
95
Pages
262-268
ISSN
0195-6663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1023151662
Cited by
51
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
6.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Appetite (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
Keywords
food addiction, causal attribution, self-diagnosis, food cravings, self-control, weight gain, unhealthy diet
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attitude, Body Weight, Cognition, Diet, Eating, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Inhibition, Psychological, Male, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reward, Self Concept, Social Perception, Body Mass Index, Behavior, Addictive, Young Adult, Craving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review