Cited by 363Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionImpact of Technology on Adolescents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 140 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are cyberbullying intervention and prevention programs effective? A systematic and meta-analytical review

Open access

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.avb.2018.07.002

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 140 references

8 of the 140 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Duval, 2000, A non-parametric ‘trim and fill’ method of assessing publication bias in meta-analysis, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 89
  2. Garaigordobil, 2017, Intervention in bullying and cyberbullying: Assessment of Martin's case, Revista de Psicologia clinica con ninos y adolescentes, 4, 25
  3. Herrera-López, 2018, Bullying y cyberbullying en latinoamérica, Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 23, 125

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 363

Metadata

Authors
Gaffney, H., Farrington, D. P., Espelage, D. L., & Ttofi, M. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Gaffney, Hannah
Venue
Aggression and Violent Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
45
Pages
134-153
ISSN
1359-1789 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883891356
Cited by
363
References
140
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 57 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 33
FWCI
50.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Aggression and Violent Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Apollo
Funders
  • Jacobs Foundation, Switzerland
  • UK Ecomonic Social Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
cyberbullying, cyberbullying prevention programs, cyberbullying intervention, cyberbullying perpetration, cyber victimization, school-aged children, program effectiveness, randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review