Cited by 460Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionCognitive Abilities and Testing

Testing the behavioral interaction and integration of attentional networks

Open access
Fan, Jin, Gu, Xiaosi, Guise, Kevin G., Liu, Xun, Fossella, John, Wang, Hongbin, Posner, Michael I.·2009·Brain and Cognition

Abstract

One current conceptualization of attention subdivides it into functions of alerting, orienting, and executive control. Alerting describes the function of tonically maintaining the alert state and phasically responding to a warning signal. Automatic and voluntary orienting are involved in the selection of information among multiple sensory inputs. Executive control describes a set of more complex operations that include detecting and resolving conflicts in order to control thoughts or behaviors. Converging evidence supports this theory of attention by showing that each function appears to be subserved by anatomically distinct networks in the brain and differentially innervated by various neuromodulatory systems. Although much research has been dedicated to understanding the functional separation of these networks in both healthy and disease states, the interaction and integration among these networks still remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to characterize possible behavioral interaction and integration in healthy adult volunteers using a revised attention network test (ANT-R) with cue-target interval and cue validity manipulations. We found that whereas alerting improves overall response speed, it exerts negative influence on executive control under certain conditions. A valid orienting cue enhances but an invalid cue diminishes the ability of executive control to overcome conflict. The results support the hypothesis of functional integration and interaction of these brain networks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bandc.2009.02.002

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ANT-R is calibrated for healthy individuals to operate at high efficiency.

    “The ANT-R is calibrated for healthy individuals to operate at high efficiency (Fan et al., 2009).”

    From Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2009

    The Methods (§2.1, page unavailable) report testing young adult volunteers, and §2.2 says the ANT-R was designed to optimize attentional contrasts. But §2.2 says its changes were made to increase attentional demands, not that it was calibrated for healthy individuals to operate at high efficiency. The Results report 94% overall accuracy, which does not establish that design claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The alerting network is the most basic attentional network and enables functioning of the other two systems; impaired alerting reduces effectiveness of orienting and executive attention.

    “The alerting network is the most basic attentional network and enables functioning of the other two systems; impaired alerting reduces effectiveness of orienting and executive attention (Fan et al., 2009).”

    From Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2009

    Section 1.1.1 describes the alert state as critical for optimal performance in higher cognitive tasks, and Section 1.3 reports that alerting can enhance orienting. But the paper does not call alerting the most basic network or say that impaired alerting reduces the effectiveness of both other networks. The Discussion instead finds that alerting interferes with executive control under certain conditions. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Higher efficiency of the alerting network is associated with higher efficiency of the executive network, but with lower additional executive benefits due to additional alerting benefits.

    “The higher efficiency of alerting network is associated with the higher efficiency of executive network, but with the lower additional executive benefits due to the additional alerting benefits.”

    From Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2009

    The Discussion reports that alerting cues improved overall response speed but increased the conflict effect, especially at a 400 ms cue–target interval. This supports reduced executive-control benefit under certain alerting conditions. It does not support the broader claim that people with more efficient alerting also have more efficient executive control: Results §3.3 says the flanker conflict effect was not significantly correlated with other network scores. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • ANT-R is calibrated for healthy individuals to perform at a high level of efficiency and, consequently, with very small room for additional improvement in efficiency of the executive network.

    “ANT-R (Fan et al., 2009) is calibrated for healthy individuals to be able to perform at a high level of efficiency and, consequently, with very small room for additional improvement in efficiency of the executive network.”

    From Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2009

    The Methods (§2.2) identify this paper as the source of ANT-R, and the study used healthy adult volunteers. The Results (§3) report 94% overall accuracy, but the paper does not say ANT-R was calibrated to leave little room for improvement in executive-network efficiency; the Discussion (§4) instead reports improved executive-control performance with valid orienting cues. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The three attentional networks support distinct attentional functions but operate interdependently.

    “While these networks support distinct attentional functions, they operate interdependently.”

    From Externally orienting cues improve cognitive control in OCD (2024) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2009

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, J., Gu, X., Guise, K. G., Liu, X., Fossella, J., Wang, H., & Posner, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Fan, Jin
Venue
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-07
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
209-220
ISSN
0278-2626 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2144464029
Cited by
458
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 39 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 22
FWCI
8.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain and Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH083164, R21MH083164)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
attentional networks, alerting, orienting, executive function, cue-target interval, cue validity, conflict resolution, response speed, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Cognition, Conflict, Psychological, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Task Performance and Analysis, Linear Models, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review