Cited by 286Neural dynamics and brain functionNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

The relation of brain oscillations to attentional networks

Open access
Fan, J., Byrne, J., Worden, M. S., Guise, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., Posner, M. I.·2007·Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested the relation of particular frequency bands such as theta (4-8 Hz), alpha (8-14 Hz), beta (14-30 Hz), or gamma (>30 Hz) to cognitive functions. However, there has been controversy over which bands are specifically related to attention. We used the attention network test to separate three anatomically defined brain networks that carry out the functions of alerting, orienting, and executive control of attention. High-density scalp electrical recording was performed to record synchronous oscillatory activity and power spectrum analyses based on functional magnetic resonance imaging constrained dipole modeling were conducted for each attentional network. We found that each attentional network has a distinct set of oscillations related to its activity. The alerting network showed a specific decrease in theta-, alpha-, and beta-band activity 200-450 ms after a warning signal. The orienting network showed an increase in gamma-band activity at approximately 200 ms after a spatial cue, indicating the location of a target. The executive control network revealed a complex pattern when a target was surrounded with incongruent flankers compared with congruent flankers. There was an early (<400 ms) increase in gamma-band activity, a later (>400 ms) decrease in beta- and low gamma-band activity after the target onset, and a decrease of all frequency bands before response followed by an increase after the response. These data demonstrate that attention is not related to any single frequency band but that each network has a distinct oscillatory activity and time course.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.1833-07.2007

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The three attentional networks show some behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical independence.

    “These three networks have been shown to have some degree of behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroanatomical independence (Fan et al., 2007; Fan, McCandliss, Sommer, Raz, & Posner, 2002; Fan, McCandliss, Fossella, Flombaum, & Posner, 2005; see Raz & Buhle, 2006, for a recent review).”

    From Atypical attentional networks and the emergence of autism (2013) · cites this paper as Fan et al., 2007

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Hillyard SA, Di Russo F, Martinez A (2004) The imaging of visual attention. In: Functional neuroimaging of visual cognition attention and perfor- mance XX (Kanwisher N, Duncan J, eds), pp 381-390. Oxford: Oxford UP.
  2. Marrocco RT, Davidson MC (1998) Neurochemistry of attention. In: The attentive brain (Parasuraman R, ed), pp 35-50. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fan, J., Byrne, J., Worden, M. S., Guise, K. G., McCandliss, B. D., Fossella, J., & Posner, M. I.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • University of Oregon (US)
Venue
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2007-06-06
Volume
27
Issue
23
Pages
6197-6206
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2103368010
Cited by
286
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (9907831)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Keywords
neural oscillations, attentional networks, Attention Network Test, alerting, orienting, executive function, gamma oscillations, beta activity, theta activity, alpha activity, high-density EEG, flanker task, spatial cueing, warning signs
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Biological Clocks, Brain, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review