Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chromatin dynamics: Interplay between remodeling enzymes and histone modifications

Open access
Swygert, Sarah G., Peterson, Craig L.·2014·Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
DOI 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Chromatin dynamics play an essential role in regulating the accessibility of genomic DNA for a variety of nuclear processes, including gene transcription and DNA repair. The posttranslational modification of the core histones and the action of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes represent two primary mechanisms by which chromatin dynamics are controlled and linked to nuclear events. Although there are examples in which a histone modification or a remodeling enzyme may be sufficient to drive a chromatin transition, these mechanisms typically work in concert to integrate regulatory inputs, leading to a coordinated alteration in chromatin structure and function. Indeed, site-specific histone modifications can facilitate the recruitment of chromatin remodeling enzymes to particular genomic regions, or they can regulate the efficiency or the outcome of a chromatin remodeling reaction. Conversely, chromatin remodeling enzymes can also influence, and sometimes directly modulate, the modification state of histones. These functional interactions are generally complex, frequently transient, and often require the association of myriad additional factors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.013

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Research works printed but not linked: 137

  1. Hargreaves, 2011, ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling: genetics, genomics and mechanisms, Cell Res., 21, 396, 10.1038/cr.2011.32 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Luger, 1997, Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8Å resolution, Nature, 389, 251, 10.1038/38444 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Shogren-Knaak, 2006, Histone H4-K16 acetylation controls chromatin structure and protein interactions, Science, 311, 844, 10.1126/science.1124000 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Fierz, 2011, Histone H2B ubiquitylation disrupts local and higher-order chromatin compaction, Nat. Chem. Biol., 7, 1, 10.1038/nchembio.501 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Patel, 2013, Readout of epigenetic modifications, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 82, 81, 10.1146/annurev-biochem-072711-165700 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Papamichos-Chronakis, 2013, Chromatin and the genome integrity network, Nat. Rev. Genet., 14, 62, 10.1038/nrg3345 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Clapier, 2009, The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 78, 273, 10.1146/annurev.biochem.77.062706.153223 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Boyer, 2000, Functional delineation of three groups of the ATP-dependent family of chromatin remodeling enzymes, J. Biol. Chem., 275, 18864, 10.1074/jbc.M002810200 · DOI
  9. Allfrey, 1964, Acetylation and methylation of histones and their possible role in the regulation of RNA synthesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 51, 786, 10.1073/pnas.51.5.786 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Pogo, 1966, RNA synthesis and histone acetylation during the course of gene activation in lymphocytes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 55, 805, 10.1073/pnas.55.4.805 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Vidali, 1978, Butyrate suppression of histone deacetylation leads to accumulation of multiacetylated forms of histones H3 and H4 and increased DNase I sensitivity of the associated DNA sequences, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 75, 2239, 10.1073/pnas.75.5.2239 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Tse, 1998, Disruption of higher-order folding by core histone acetylation dramatically enhances transcription of nucleosomal arrays by RNA Polymerase III, Mol. Cell. Biol., 18, 4629, 10.1128/MCB.18.8.4629 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Ferreira, 2007, Histone modifications influence the action of Snf2 family remodelling enzymes by different mechanisms, J. Mol. Biol., 374, 563, 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.059 · DOI
  14. Watanabe, 2010, Structural characterization of H3K56Q nucleosomes and nucleosomal arrays, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1799, 480, 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2010.01.009 · DOI
  15. Neumann, 2009, A method for genetically installing site-specific acetylation in recombinant histones defines the effects of H3 K56 acetylation, Mol. Cell, 36, 153, 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.07.027 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Horn, 2001, The bromodomain: a regulator of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling?, Front. Biosci., 6, D1019, 10.2741/Horn · DOI
  17. Owen, 2000, The structural basis for the recognition of acetylated histone H4 by the bromodomain of histone acetyltransferase Gcn5p, EMBO J., 19, 6141, 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6141 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Haynes, 1992, The bromodomain: a conserved sequence found in human, Drosophila and yeast proteins, Nucleic Acids Res., 20, 2603, 10.1093/nar/20.10.2603 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Tamkun, 1992, Brahma: a regulator of Drosophila homeotic genes structurally related to the yeast transcriptional activator SNF2/SWI2, Cell, 68, 561, 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90191-E · DOI · Paper page
  20. Jeanmougin, 1997, The bromodomain revisited, Trends Biochem. Sci., 22, 151, 10.1016/S0968-0004(97)01042-6 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Dürr, 2006, Snf2 family ATPases and DExx box helicases: differences and unifying concepts from high-resolution crystal structures, Nucleic Acids Res., 34, 4160, 10.1093/nar/gkl540 · DOI
  22. Roberts, 1997, Essential functional interactions of SAGA, a Saccharomyces cerevisiae Complex of Spt, Ada, and Gcn5 proteins, with the Snf/Swi and Srb/mediator complexes, Genetics, 147, 465, 10.1093/genetics/147.2.451 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Pollard, 1997, Role for ADA/GCN5 products in antagonizing chromatin-mediated transcriptional repression, Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 6212, 10.1128/MCB.17.11.6212 · DOI
  24. Pollard, 1998, Chromatin remodeling: a marriage between two families?, Bioessays, 20, 771, 10.1002/(SICI)1521-1878(199809)20:9<771::AID-BIES10>3.0.CO;2-V · DOI
  25. Cosma, 1999, Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter, Cell, 97, 299, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80740-0 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Natarajan, 1999, Transcriptional activation by Gcn4p involves independent interactions with the SWI/SNF complex and the SRB/mediator, Mol. Cell, 4, 657, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80217-8 · DOI
  27. De Serna, 2005, MyoD targets chromatin remodeling complexes to the myogenin locus prior to forming a stable DNA-bound complex, Mol. Cell. Biol., 10, 3997, 10.1128/MCB.25.10.3997-4009.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Salma, 2004, Temporal recruitment of transcription factors and SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling enzymes during adipogenic induction of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ nuclear hormone receptor, Mol. Cell. Biol., 11, 4651, 10.1128/MCB.24.11.4651-4663.2004 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Agalioti, 2002, Deciphering the transcriptional histone acetylation code for a human gene, Cell, 111, 381, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01077-2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Lee, 2010, A cooperative activation loop among SWI/SNF, gamma-H2AX and H3 acetylation for DNA double-strand break repair, EMBO J., 29, 1434, 10.1038/emboj.2010.27 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Syntichaki, 2000, The Gcn5 bromodomain co-ordinates nucleosome remodelling, Nature, 404, 414, 10.1038/35006136 · DOI
  32. Hassan, 2001, Histone acetyltransferase complexes stabilize SWI/SNF binding to promoter nucleosomes, Cell, 104, 817, 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00279-3 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Chandy, 2006, SWI/SNF displaces SAGA-acetylated nucleosomes, Eukaryot. Cell, 5, 1738, 10.1128/EC.00165-06 · DOI
  34. Hassan, 2002, Function and selectivity of bromodomains in anchoring chromatin-modifying complexes to promoter nucleosomes, Cell, 111, 369, 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)01005-X · DOI · Paper page
  35. Prochasson, 2003, Targeting activity is required for SWI/SNF function in vivo and is accomplished through two partially redundant activator-interaction domains, Mol. Cell, 12, 983, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00366-6 · DOI
  36. Ferreira, 2009, Activator-binding domains of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex characterized in vitro are required for its recruitment to promoters in vivo, FEBS J., 276, 2557, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2009.06979.x · DOI
  37. Kasten, 2004, Tandem bromodomains in the chromatin remodeler RSC recognize acetylated histone H3 Lys14, EMBO J., 23, 1348, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600143 · DOI
  38. Chatterjee, 2011, Histone H3 tail acetylation modulates ATP-dependent remodeling through multiple mechanisms, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, 8378, 10.1093/nar/gkr535 · DOI
  39. VanDemark, 2007, Autoregulation of the Rsc4 tandem bromodomain by Gcn5 acetylation, Mol. Cell, 27, 817, 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.018 · DOI
  40. Charlop-Powers, 2010, Structural insights into selective histone H3 recognition by the human Polybromo bromodomain 2, Cell Res., 20, 529, 10.1038/cr.2010.43 · DOI
  41. Nicolas, 1996, Molecular cloning of polybromo, a nuclear protein containing multiple domains including five bromodomains, a truncated HMG-box, and two repeats of a novel domain, Gene, 175, 233, 10.1016/0378-1119(96)82845-9 · DOI
  42. Middeljans, 2012, SS18 together with animal-specific factors defines human BAF-type SWI/SNF complexes, PLoS One, 7, e33834, 10.1371/journal.pone.0033834 · DOI
  43. Cairns, 1999, Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains, Mol. Cell, 4, 715, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80382-2 · DOI
  44. Altaf, 2010, NuA4-dependent acetylation of nucleosomal histones H4 and H2A directly stimulates incorporation of H2A.Z by the SWR1 complex, J. Biol. Chem., 285, 15966, 10.1074/jbc.M110.117069 · DOI
  45. Krogan, 2003, A Snf2 family ATPase complex required for recruitment of the histone H2A variant Htz1, Mol. Cell, 12, 1565, 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00497-0 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Mizuguchi, 2004, ATP-driven exchange of histone H2AZ variant catalyzed by SWR1 chromatin remodeling complex, Science, 303, 343, 10.1126/science.1090701 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kobor, 2004, A protein complex containing the conserved Swi2/Snf2-related ATPase Swr1p deposits histone variant H2A.Z into euchromatin, PLoS Biol., 2, E131, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020131 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Keogh, 2006, The Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H2A variant Htz1 is acetylated by NuA4, Genes Dev., 20, 660, 10.1101/gad.1388106 · DOI
  49. Ranjan, 2013, Nucleosome-free region dominates histone acetylation in targeting SWR1 to promoters for H2A.Z replacement, Cell, 154, 1232, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.08.005 · DOI
  50. Sims, 2006, Histone H3 Lys 4 methylation: caught in a bind?, Genes Dev., 20, 2779, 10.1101/gad.1468206 · DOI
  51. Petty, 2013, Balancing chromatin remodeling and histone modifications in transcription, Trends Genet., 29, 621, 10.1016/j.tig.2013.06.006 · DOI
  52. Li, 2007, Structural basis for lower lysine methylation state-specific readout by MBT repeats of L3MBTL1 and an engineered PHD finger, Mol. Cell, 28, 677, 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.10.023 · DOI
  53. Bonasio, 2010, MBT domain proteins in development and disease, Semin. Cell Dev. Biol., 21, 221, 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.09.010 · DOI
  54. Trojer, 2007, L3MBTL1, a histone-methylation-dependent chromatin lock, Cell, 129, 915, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.048 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Paro, 1991, The Polycomb protein shares a homologous domain with a heterochromatin-associated protein of Drosophila, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 88, 263, 10.1073/pnas.88.1.263 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Fischle, 2003, Molecular basis for the discrimination of repressive methyl-lysine marks in histone H3 by Polycomb and HP1 chromodomains, Genes Dev., 17, 1870, 10.1101/gad.1110503 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Min, 2003, Structural basis for specific binding of Polycomb chromodomain to histone H3 methylated at Lys 27, Genes Dev., 17, 1823, 10.1101/gad.269603 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Pascual, 2000, Structure of the PHD zinc finger from human Williams–Beuren syndrome transcription factor, J. Mol. Biol., 304, 723, 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4308 · DOI
  59. Brehm, 2004, The many colours of chromodomains, Bioessays, 26, 133, 10.1002/bies.10392 · DOI
  60. Qiu, 2010, Activity of a C-terminal plant homeodomain (PHD) of Msc1 is essential for function, J. Biol. Chem., 285, 36828, 10.1074/jbc.M110.157792 · DOI
  61. Marfella, 2007, The Chd family of chromatin remodelers, Mutat. Res., 618, 30, 10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.07.012 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Boyer, 2004, The SANT domain: a unique histone-tail-binding module?, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5, 158, 10.1038/nrm1314 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Morettini, 2011, The chromodomains of CHD1 are critical for enzymatic activity but less important for chromatin localization, Nucleic Acids Res., 39, 3103, 10.1093/nar/gkq1298 · DOI
  64. Kelley, 1999, CHD1 interacts with SSRP1 and depends on both its chromodomain and its ATPase/helicase-like domain for proper association with chromatin, Chromosoma, 108, 10, 10.1007/s004120050347 · DOI
  65. Bouazoune, 2002, The dMi-2 chromodomains are DNA binding modules important for ATP-dependent nucleosome mobilization, EMBO J., 21, 2430, 10.1093/emboj/21.10.2430 · DOI
  66. Allen, 2013, The NuRD architecture, Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 70, 3513, 10.1007/s00018-012-1256-2 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Kehle, 1998, dMi-2, a Hunchback-Interacting Protein That Functions in Polycomb Repression, Science, 282, 1897, 10.1126/science.282.5395.1897 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Kaji, 2006, The NuRD component Mbd3 is required for pluripotency of embryonic stem cells, Nat. Cell Biol., 8, 285, 10.1038/ncb1372 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Yildirim, 2011, Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells, Cell, 147, 1498, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.054 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Musselman, 2009, Binding of the CHD4 PHD2 finger to histone H3 is modulated by covalent modifications, Biochem. J., 423, 179, 10.1042/BJ20090870 · DOI
  71. Pray-Grant, 2005, Chd1 chromodomain links histone H3 methylation with SAGA- and SLIK-dependent acetylation, Nature, 433, 434, 10.1038/nature03242 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Flanagan, 2005, Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail, Nature, 438, 1181, 10.1038/nature04290 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Sims, 2005, Human but not yeast CHD1 binds directly and selectively to histone H3 methylated at lysine 4 via its tandem chromodomains, J. Biol. Chem., 280, 41789, 10.1074/jbc.C500395200 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Lin, 2011, Mediator coordinates PIC assembly with recruitment of CHD1, Genes Dev., 25, 2198, 10.1101/gad.17554711 · DOI
  75. Simic, 2003, Chromatin remodeling protein Chd1 interacts with transcription elongation factors and localizes to transcribed genes, EMBO J., 22, 1846, 10.1093/emboj/cdg179 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Wysocka, 2006, A PHD finger of NURF couples histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation with chromatin remodelling, Nature, 442, 86, 10.1038/nature04815 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Li, 2006, Molecular basis for site-specific read-out of histone H3K4me3 by the BPTF PHD finger of NURF, Nature, 442, 91, 10.1038/nature04802 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Ruthenburg, 2011, Recognition of a mononucleosomal histone modification pattern by BPTF via multivalent interactions, Cell, 145, 692, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.053 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Ruthenburg, 2007, Multivalent engagement of chromatin modifications by linked binding modules, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 8, 983, 10.1038/nrm2298 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Badenhorst, 2002, Biological functions of the ISWI chromatin remodeling complex NURF, Genes Dev., 16, 3186, 10.1101/gad.1032202 · DOI
  81. Song, 2009, The ISWI-containing NURF complex regulates the output of the canonical Wingless pathway, EMBO Rep., 10, 1140, 10.1038/embor.2009.157 · DOI
  82. Landry, 2008, Essential role of chromatin remodeling protein BPTF in early mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells, PLoS Genet., 4, e1000241, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000241 · DOI
  83. Kamine, 1996, Identification of a cellular protein that specifically interacts with the essential cysteine region of the HIV-1 Tat transactivator, Virology, 216, 357, 10.1006/viro.1996.0071 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Fazzio, 2008, An RNAi screen of chromatin proteins identifies Tip60-p400 as a regulator of embryonic stem cell identity, Cell, 134, 162, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.05.031 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Brady, 1999, Tip60 is a nuclear hormone receptor coactivator, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 17599, 10.1074/jbc.274.25.17599 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Smith, 1998, ESA1 is a histone acetyltransferase that is essential for growth in yeast, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 95, 3561, 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3561 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Ikura, 2000, Involvement of the TIP60 histone acetylase complex in DNA repair and apoptosis, Cell, 102, 463, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)00051-9 · DOI · Paper page
  88. Kusch, 2004, Acetylation by Tip60 is required for selective histone variant exchange at DNA lesions, Science, 306, 2084, 10.1126/science.1103455 · DOI · Paper page
  89. Auger, 2008, Eaf1 is the platform for NuA4 molecular assembly that evolutionarily links chromatin acetylation to ATP-dependent exchange of histone H2A variants, Mol. Cell. Biol., 28, 2257, 10.1128/MCB.01755-07 · DOI
  90. Xue, 1998, NURD, a novel complex with both and histone deacetylase activities, Mol. Cell, 2, 851, 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80299-3 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Wade, 1999, Mi-2 complex couples DNA methylation to chromatin remodelling and histone deacetylation, Nat. Genet., 23, 62, 10.1038/12664 · DOI · Paper page
  92. Helbling Chadwick, 2009, The Mi-2/NuRD complex associates with pericentromeric heterochromatin during S phase in rapidly proliferating lymphoid cells, Chromosoma, 118, 445, 10.1007/s00412-009-0207-7 · DOI
  93. Sims, 2011, Mi-2/NuRD complex function is required for normal S phase progression and assembly of pericentric heterochromatin, Mol. Biol. Cell, 22, 3094, 10.1091/mbc.E11-03-0258 · DOI
  94. Pegoraro, 2009, Ageing-related chromatin defects through loss of the NURD complex, Nat. Cell Biol., 11, 1261, 10.1038/ncb1971 · DOI · Paper page
  95. Mermoud, 2011, Keeping chromatin quiet: how nucleosome remodeling restores heterochromatin after replication, Cell Cycle, 10, 4017, 10.4161/cc.10.23.18558 · DOI
  96. Rowbotham, 2011, Maintenance of silent chromatin through replication requires SWI/SNF-like chromatin remodeler SMARCAD1, Mol. Cell, 42, 285, 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.036 · DOI
  97. Costelloe, 2012, The yeast Fun30 and human SMARCAD1 chromatin remodellers promote DNA end resection, Nature, 489, 581, 10.1038/nature11353 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Chen, 2012, The Fun30 nucleosome remodeller promotes resection of DNA double-strand break ends, Nature, 489, 576, 10.1038/nature11355 · DOI
  99. Briggs, 2002, Gene silencing: trans-histone regulatory pathway in chromatin, Nature, 418, 498, 10.1038/nature00970 · DOI · Paper page
  100. Zediak, 2008, Hit and run: transient deubiquitylase activity in a chromatin-remodeling complex, Mol. Cell, 31, 773, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.005 · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.005
  101. Yao, 2008, Distinct modes of regulation of the Uch37 deubiquitinating enzyme in the proteasome and in the Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex, Mol. Cell, 31, 909, 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.08.027 · DOI
  102. Logie, 1999, The core histone N-terminal domains are required for multiple rounds of catalytic chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF and RSC complexes, Biochemistry, 38, 2514, 10.1021/bi982109d · DOI
  103. Corona, 2002, Modulation of ISWI function by site-specific histone acetylation, EMBO Rep., 3, 242, 10.1093/embo-reports/kvf056 · DOI
  104. Clapier, 2012, Regulation of ISWI involves inhibitory modules antagonized by nucleosomal epitopes, Nature, 492, 280, 10.1038/nature11625 · DOI
  105. Manning, 2013, Releasing the brakes on a chromatin-remodeling enzyme, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 20, 5, 10.1038/nsmb.2482 · doi:10.1038/nsmb.2482
  106. Mueller-Planitz, 2013, The ATPase domain of ISWI is an autonomous nucleosome remodeling machine, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 20, 82, 10.1038/nsmb.2457 · DOI
  107. Hauk, 2010, The chromodomains of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler regulate DNA access to the ATPase motor, Mol. Cell, 39, 711, 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.08.012 · DOI · Paper page
  108. Peterson, 2007, Genome integrity: a HAT needs a chaperone, Curr. Biol., 17, R324, 10.1016/j.cub.2007.03.011 · DOI
  109. Ozdemir, 2006, Histone H3 lysine 56 acetylation: a new twist in the chromosome cycle, Cell Cycle, 5, 2602, 10.4161/cc.5.22.3473 · doi:10.4161/cc.5.22.3473
  110. Kaplan, 2008, Cell cycle- and chaperone-mediated regulation of H3K56ac incorporation in yeast, PLoS Genet., 4, e1000270, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000270 · DOI
  111. Chen, 2008, Acetylated lysine 56 on histone H3 drives chromatin assembly after repair and signals for the completion of repair, Cell, 134, 231, 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.035 · DOI · Paper page
  112. Das, 2009, CBP/p300-mediated acetylation of histone H3 on lysine 56, Nature, 459, 113, 10.1038/nature07861 · DOI · Paper page
  113. Tan, 2013, Acetylated histone H3K56 interacts with Oct4 to promote mouse embryonic stem cell pluripotency, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110, 11493, 10.1073/pnas.1309914110 · DOI
  114. Watanabe, 2013, A histone acetylation switch regulates H2A.Z deposition by the SWR-C remodeling enzyme, Science, 340, 195, 10.1126/science.1229758 · DOI
  115. Watanabe, 2013, Chromatin dynamics: flipping the switch on a chromatin remodeling machine, Cell Cycle, 12, 2337, 10.4161/cc.25704 · doi:10.4161/cc.25704
  116. Bennett, 2013, DNA repair choice defines a common pathway for recruitment of chromatin regulators, Nat. Commun., 4, 2084, 10.1038/ncomms3084 · DOI
  117. Rogakou, 1999, Megabase chromatin domains involved in DNA double-strand breaks in vivo, J. Cell Biol., 146, 905, 10.1083/jcb.146.5.905 · DOI · Paper page
  118. Shroff, 2004, Distribution and dynamics of chromatin modification induced by a defined DNA double-strand break, Curr. Biol., 14, 1703, 10.1016/j.cub.2004.09.047 · DOI · Paper page
  119. Park, 2006, Mammalian SWI/SNF complexes facilitate DNA double-strand break repair by promoting gamma-H2AX induction, EMBO J., 25, 3986, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601291 · DOI · Paper page
  120. Nakamura, 2011, Regulation of homologous recombination by RNF20-dependent H2B ubiquitination, Mol. Cell, 41, 515, 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.02.002 · DOI · Paper page
  121. Williams, 2007, Transcriptional regulation by chromatin disassembly and reassembly, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 17, 88, 10.1016/j.gde.2007.02.001 · DOI
  122. Kizer, 2005, A novel domain in Set2 mediates RNA polymerase II interaction and couples histone H3 K36 methylation with transcript elongation, Mol. Cell. Biol., 25, 3305, 10.1128/MCB.25.8.3305-3316.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  123. Krogan, 2003, Methylation of histone H3 by Set2 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is linked to transcriptional elongation by RNA polymerase II, Mol. Cell. Biol., 23, 4207, 10.1128/MCB.23.12.4207-4218.2003 · DOI · Paper page
  124. Li, 2003, The Set2 histone methyltransferase functions through the phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II, J. Biol. Chem., 278, 8897, 10.1074/jbc.M212134200 · DOI · Paper page
  125. Verreault, 2000, De novo nucleosome assembly: new pieces in an old puzzle, Genes Dev., 14, 1430, 10.1101/gad.14.12.1430 · DOI
  126. Li, 2007, Infrequently transcribed long genes depend on the Set2/Rpd3S pathway for accurate transcription, Genes Dev., 21, 1422, 10.1101/gad.1539307 · DOI
  127. Carrozza, 2005, Histone H3 methylation by Set2 directs deacetylation of coding regions by Rpd3S to suppress spurious intragenic transcription, Cell, 123, 581, 10.1016/j.cell.2005.10.023 · DOI · Paper page
  128. Li, 2007, Combined action of PHD and chromo domains directs the Rpd3S HDAC to transcribed chromatin, Science, 316, 1050, 10.1126/science.1139004 · DOI · Paper page
  129. Smolle, 2012, Chromatin remodelers Isw1 and Chd1 maintain chromatin structure during transcription by preventing histone exchange, Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol., 19, 884, 10.1038/nsmb.2312 · DOI · Paper page
  130. Maltby, 2012, Histone H3 lysine 36 methylation targets the Isw1b remodeling complex to chromatin, Mol. Cell. Biol., 32, 3479, 10.1128/MCB.00389-12 · DOI
  131. Lee, 2013, Chromatin remodelers fine-tune H3K36me-directed deacetylation of neighbor nucleosomes by Rpd3S, Mol. Cell, 52, 255, 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.024 · DOI
  132. Huh, 2012, Multivalent di-nucleosome recognition enables the Rpd3S histone deacetylase complex to tolerate decreased H3K36 methylation levels, EMBO J., 31, 3564, 10.1038/emboj.2012.221 · DOI
  133. Lee, 2012, Codependency of H2B monoubiquitination and nucleosome reassembly on Chd1, Genes Dev., 26, 914, 10.1101/gad.186841.112 · DOI
  134. Côté, 1994, Stimulation of GAL4 derivative binding to nucleosomal DNA by the yeast SWI/SNF complex, Science, 265, 53, 10.1126/science.8016655 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Kwon, 1994, Nucleosome disruption and enhancement of activator binding by a human SW1/SNF complex, Nature, 370, 477, 10.1038/370477a0 · DOI · Paper page
  136. Imbalzano, 1994, Facilitated binding of TATA-binding protein to nucleosomal DNA, Nature, 370, 481, 10.1038/370481a0 · DOI · Paper page
  137. Brownell, 1996, Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation, Cell, 84, 843, 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81063-6 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Swygert, S. G., & Peterson, C. L.
Venue
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-08
Volume
1839
Issue
8
Pages
728-736
ISSN
1874-9399 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.013
OpenAlex
W2061434854
Cited by
256
References
10
FWCI
11.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Chromatin dynamics: Interplay between remodeling enzymes and histone modifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.013
The paper
Swygert, S. G., & Peterson, C. L. (2014). Chromatin dynamics: Interplay between remodeling enzymes and histone modifications. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.02.013

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.