Cited by 45Tryptophan and brain disordersMental Health Research TopicsTreatment of Major Depression

Inflammatory phenotype of depression symptom structure: A network perspective

Open access
Moriarity, Daniel P., van Borkulo, Claudia, Alloy, Lauren B.·2021·Brain Behavior and Immunity

Abstract

Background There has been increasing interest in classifying inflammatory phenotypes of depression. Most investigations into inflammatory phenotypes only have tested whether elevated inflammation is associated with elevated levels of depression symptoms, or risk for a diagnosis. This study expanded the definition of phenotype to include the structure of depression symptoms as a function of inflammation.Methods Network models of depression symptoms were estimated in a sample of 4157 adults (mean age = 47.6, 51% female) from the 2015-2016 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Analyses included comparisons of networks between those with elevated (C-reactive protein (CRP) values ≥ 3.0 mg/L; N = 1696) and non-elevated CRP (N = 2841) as well as moderated network models with CRP group status and raw CRP values moderating the associations between depression symptoms.Results Differences emerged at all levels of analysis (global, symptom-specific, symptom-symptom associations). Specifically, the elevated CRP group had greater symptom connectivity (stronger total associations between symptoms). Further, difficulty concentrating and psychomotor difficulties had higher expected influence (concordance with other symptoms) in the elevated CRP group. Finally, there was evidence that several symptom-symptom associations were moderated by CRP.Conclusions This study provides consistent evidence that the structure of depression symptoms varies as a function of CRP levels. Greater symptom connectivity might contribute to why elevated CRP is associated with treatment-resistant depression. Additionally, differences in symptom structure might highlight different maintenance mechanisms and treatment targets for individuals with compared to those without elevated CRP. Finally, differences in symptom structure as a function of CRP highlight a potential misalignment of standard depression measures (the structure of which are evaluated on groups unselected for CRP levels) and the presentation of depression symptoms in those with elevated CRP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.12.005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In 4157 adults, the elevated CRP group (>3 mg/L) showed greater symptom connectivity, concentration, psychomotor difficulties, and treatment-resistant depression.

    “A recent network analysis investigated the association between inflammation and a specific depression phenotype [69]. PHQ-9 was administered to a sample of 4157 adults from the NHANES while hs-CRP levels were measured to identify possible inflammatory phenotypes of depression [69]. The elevated CRP group (>3 mg/L) showed greater symptom connectivity, concentration, psychomotor difficulties, and”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moriarity, D. P., van Borkulo, C., & Alloy, L. B.
Affiliations
Temple University (US)
Corresponding author
Moriarity, Daniel P.
Venue
Brain Behavior and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
93
Pages
35-42
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3111616629
Cited by
45
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10
FWCI
1.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • TUScholarShare (Temple University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (F31MH122116, R01 MH101168)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
depression, inflammatory phenotype, C-reactive protein, symptom networks, concentration difficulties, psychomotor symptoms, treatment-resistant depression, inflammation, NHANES
MeSH terms
Adult, C-Reactive Protein, Depression, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Phenotype, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review