Cited by 773Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis

Race and Gender Differences in C-Reactive Protein Levels

Open access
Khera, Amit, McGuire, Darren K., Murphy, Sabina A., Stanek, Harold G., Das, Sandeep R., Vongpatanasin, Wanpen, Wians, Frank H., Grundy, Scott M. +1 more·2005·Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Abstract

Objectives This study sought to determine whether there are race and gender differences in the distribution of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels.Background Few data are available comparing CRP distributions in different race and gender groups. Recent clinical practice recommendations for CRP testing for cardiovascular risk assessment suggest a uniform threshold to define high relative risk (>3 mg/l).Methods We measured CRP in 2,749 white and black subjects ages 30 to 65 participating in the Dallas Heart Study, a multiethnic, population-based, probability sample, and compared levels of CRP between different race and gender groups.Results Black subjects had higher CRP levels than white subjects (median, 3.0 vs. 2.3 mg/l; p < 0.001) and women had higher CRP levels than men (median, 3.3 vs. 1.8 mg/l; p < 0.001). The sample-weight adjusted proportion of subjects with CRP levels >3 mg/l was 31%, 40%, 51%, and 58% in white men, black men, white women, and black women, respectively (p < 0.05 for each group vs. white men). After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, estrogen and statin use, and body mass index, a CRP level >3 mg/l remained more common in white women (odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1 to 2.5) and black women (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.6) but not in black men (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.9) when compared with white men.Conclusions Significant race and gender differences exist in the population distribution of CRP. Further research is needed to determine whether race and gender differences in CRP levels contribute to differences in cardiovascular outcomes, and whether thresholds for cardiovascular risk assessment should be adjusted for different race and gender groups.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.051

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khera, A., McGuire, D. K., Murphy, S. A., Stanek, H. G., Das, S. R., Vongpatanasin, W., Wians, F. H., Grundy, S. M., & de Lemos, J. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Khera, Amit
Venue
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-08
Volume
46
Issue
3
Pages
464-469
ISSN
0735-1097 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165890913
Cited by
773
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 54 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 41
FWCI
32.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digest of the World Core Medical Journals
Funders
  • Donald W. Reynolds Foundation
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000633, M01 RR00633)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Keywords
C-reactive protein, racial differences, gender differences, cardiovascular risk assessment, black-white disparities, women, Dallas Heart Study, cardiovascular risk factors, estrogen, statin use
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Black or African American, C-Reactive Protein, Cardiovascular Diseases, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sex Factors, Biomarkers, Risk Assessment, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review