Cited by 84Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Learning-related changes in response patterns of prefrontal neurons during instrumental conditioning.

Mulder, Antonius B., Nordquist, Rebecca E., Örgüt, Okyay, Pennartz, Cyriel M.A.·2003·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

A crucial aspect of organizing goal-directed behavior is the ability to form neural representations of relationships between environmental stimuli, actions and reinforcement. Very little is known yet about the neural encoding of response-reward relationships, a process which is deemed essential for purposeful behavior. To investigate this, tetrode recordings were made in the medial prefrontal cortex (PFC) of rats performing a Go-NoGo task. After task acquisition, a subset of neurons showed a sustained change in firing during the rewarded action sequence that was triggered by a specific visual cue. When these changes were monitored in the course of learning, they were seen to develop in parallel with the behavioral learning curve and were highly sensitive to a switch in reward contingencies. These sustained changes correlated with the reward-associated action sequence, not with sensory or reward-predicting properties of the cue or individual motor acts per se. This novel type of neural plasticity may contribute to the formation of response-reinforcer associations and of behavioral strategies for guiding goal-directed action.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.016

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural activity in the PFC is related to engagement of specific action-outcome associations.

    “Electrophysiological studies using primates (Matsumoto et al., 2003; Matsumoto and Tanaka, 2004) and rats (Mulder et al., 2003) have found neural activity in the PFC related to engagement of specific action–outcome associations.”

    From The Effects of Methylphenidate on Goal-directed Behavior in a Rat Model of ADHD (2015) · cites this paper as Mulder et al., 2003

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulder, A. B., Nordquist, R. E., Örgüt, O., & Pennartz, C. M. A.
Corresponding author
Mulder, Antonius B.
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-11
Volume
146
Issue
1-2
Pages
77-88
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159485971
Cited by
84
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
medial prefrontal cortex, operant conditioning, neuroplasticity, reward contingency, go/no-go task, goal-directed behavior, rats
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Behavior, Animal, Conditioning, Operant, Discrimination Learning, Electrophysiology, Learning, Male, Neurons, Photic Stimulation, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Reinforcement, Psychology, Visual Perception, Rats, Wistar, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review