Cited by 131Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMemory and Neural MechanismsPsychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience

The why, what, where, when and how of goal-directed choice: neuronal and computational principles

Open access
Verschure, Paul F. M. J., Pennartz, Cyriel M. A., Pezzulo, Giovanni·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

The central problems that goal-directed animals must solve are: 'What do I need and Why, Where and When can this be obtained, and How do I get it?' or the H4W problem. Here, we elucidate the principles underlying the neuronal solutions to H4W using a combination of neurobiological and neurorobotic approaches. First, we analyse H4W from a system-level perspective by mapping its objectives onto the Distributed Adaptive Control embodied cognitive architecture which sees the generation of adaptive action in the real world as the primary task of the brain rather than optimally solving abstract problems. We next map this functional decomposition to the architecture of the rodent brain to test its consistency. Following this approach, we propose that the mammalian brain solves the H4W problem on the basis of multiple kinds of outcome predictions, integrating central representations of needs and drives (e.g. hypothalamus), valence (e.g. amygdala), world, self and task state spaces (e.g. neocortex, hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, respectively) combined with multi-modal selection (e.g. basal ganglia). In our analysis, goal-directed behaviour results from a well-structured architecture in which goals are bootstrapped on the basis of predefined needs, valence and multiple learning, memory and planning mechanisms rather than being generated by a singular computation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2013.0483

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In most psychological theories, drives are linked to basic motivations and homoeostasis, while goals are considered to have more elaborate exteroceptive sensory and cognitive aspects, but their relations are often unclear from a mechanistic viewpoint.

    “In most psychological theories, drives are usually linked to basic motivations and homoeostasis (e.g., interoceptive hunger or thirst), while goals are considered to have more elaborate (exteroceptive) sensory and cognitive aspects (e.g., dining in a restaurant), but their relations are often unclear from a mechanistic viewpoint (Pezzulo et al., 2014b, Verschure et al., 2014).”

    From Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control (2015) · cites this paper as Verschure et al., 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Verschure PFMJ, 2013, Formal minds and biological brains II: from the mirage of intelligence to a science and engineering of consciousness, IEEE Expert., 28, 33
  2. Panksepp J, 2012, The archaeology of mind: neuroevolutionary origins of human emotions (Norton series on interpersonal neurobiology)
  3. Sanchez-Fibla MS, 2010, IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. 18–22 October 2010
  4. Miller S, 1928, Sur une forme particuliere des reflexes conditionnels, C.R. Seances Soc. Polonaise Biol., 49, 1155
  5. Ringwald M, 2007, ECMR 2007–3rd European Conf. on Mobile Robots
  6. Simerly R, 1995, The rat nervous system, 353
  7. Gray JA, 2000, The neuropsychology of anxiety: an enquiry into thé functions of thesepto-hippocampal system
  8. Verschure PFMJ, 2012, The distributed adaptive control architecture of the mind, brain, body nexus, Biol. Inspired Cogn. Archit., 1, 55

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verschure, P. F. M. J., Pennartz, C. M. A., & Pezzulo, G.
Affiliations
  • Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • National Research Council (IT)
Corresponding author
Verschure, Paul F. M. J.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2014-11-05
Volume
369
Issue
1655
Pages
20130483
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2143590399
Cited by
131
References
152
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Keywords
goal-directed behavior, distributed adaptive control, embodied cognition, outcome prediction, valence, basal ganglia, hippocampus, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, hypothalamus, action planning, learning and memory, neurorobotics
MeSH terms
Animals, Artificial Intelligence, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Goals, Rodentia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review