Cited by 43Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Determinants of choice, and vulnerability and recovery in addiction

Open access
Lamb, R.J., Maguire, David R., Ginsburg, Brett C., Pinkston, Jonathan W., France, Charles P.·2016·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

Addiction may be viewed as choice governed by competing contingencies. One factor impacting choice, particularly as it relates to addiction, is sensitivity to delayed rewards. Discounting of delayed rewards influences addiction vulnerability because of competition between relatively immediate gains of drug use, e.g. intoxication, versus relatively remote gains of abstinence, e.g. family stability. Factors modifying delay sensitivity can be modeled in the laboratory. For instance, increased delay sensitivity can be similarly observed in adolescent humans and non-human animals. Similarly, genetic factors influence delay sensitivity in humans and animals. Recovery from addiction may also be viewed as choice behavior. Thus, reinforcing alternative behavior facilitates recovery because reinforcing alternative behavior decreases the frequency of using drugs. How reinforcing alternative behavior influences recovery can also be modeled in the laboratory. For instance, relapse risk decreases as abstinence duration increases, and this decreasing risk can be modeled in animals using choice procedures. In summary, addiction in many respects can be conceptualized as a problem of choice. Animal models of choice disorders stand to increase our understanding of the core processes that establish and maintain addiction and serve as a proving ground for development of novel treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.04.001

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lamb, R. J., Maguire, D. R., Ginsburg, B. C., Pinkston, J. W., & France, C. P.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
  • University of North Texas (US)
Corresponding author
Lamb, R.J.
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-06
Volume
127
Pages
35-42
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2339125300
Cited by
43
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4
FWCI
0.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA012337, R01AA016987)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K05DA017918, R01DA029254, T32DA031115)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
addiction, choice behavior, delay discounting, delay sensitivity, addiction vulnerability, addiction recovery, relapse risk, abstinence, alternative behavior, genetic factors, animal models of addiction
MeSH terms
Animals, Choice Behavior, Humans, Reinforcement, Psychology, Substance-Related Disorders, Delay Discounting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review