Cited by 1,165Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFinancial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis

Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison

Green, Leonard, Fry, Astrid F, Myerson, Joel·1994·Psychological Science

Abstract

In this study, children, young adults, and older adults chose between immediate and delayed hypothetical monetary rewards The amount of the delayed reward was held constant while its delay was varied All three age groups showed delay discounting, that is, the amount of an immediate reward judged to be of equal value to the delayed reward decreased as a function of delay The rate of discounting was highest for children and lowest for older adults, predicting a life-span developmental trend toward increased self-control Discounting of delayed rewards by all three age groups was well described by a single function with age-sensitive parameters (all R 2 s > 94) Thus, even though there are quantitative age differences in delay discounting, the existence of an age-invariant form of discount function suggests that the process of choosing between rewards of different amounts and delays is qualitatively similar across the life span

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00610.x

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The extent to which delayed rewards are discounted decreases over the lifespan.

    “While the extent to which delayed rewards are discounted decreases over the lifespan (Green, Fry, & Myerson, 1994)”
  • Over time, nicotine may increase delay discounting, especially given that younger people tend to exhibit higher delay discounting than older people.

    “which might suggest that, over time, nicotine increases delay discounting,188 especially given that this result is opposite of what might be expected based on the fact that younger people tend to exhibit higher delay discounting than older people.189”
  • Delay discounting generally decreases between young childhood and adulthood, meaning children tend to choose a smaller immediate reward over a larger delayed reward.

    “Delay discounting generally decreases between young childhood and adulthood, meaning children tend to choose a smaller immediate reward over a larger delayed reward (Christakou et al., 2011; de Water et al., 2014; Green et al., 1994; Olson et al., 2007; Scheres et al., 2006; Steinberg et al., 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J.
Affiliations
Washington University in St. Louis (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
1994-01
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
33-36
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2131954887
Cited by
1,165
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 51 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 65 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 62
FWCI
28.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Keywords
delay discounting, delayed rewards, lifespan development, self-control, age differences, children, young adults, older adults, monetary rewards

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review