Cited by 303Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

A placebo-controlled trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy and clomipramine in trichotillomania

Ninan, Philip T., Rothbaum, Barbara O., Marsteller, Frederick A., Knight, Bettina T., Eccard, Mary B.·2000·The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The major treatments reported to be effective in the treatment of trichotillomania are cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) with habit reversal and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors such as clomipramine. However, the 2 treatments have not been previously compared with each other. This study examines the efficacy of CBT and clomipramine compared with placebo in the treatment of trichotillomania. METHOD: Twenty-three patients with trichotillomania as determined by the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R entered and 16 completed a 9-week, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-treatment study of CBT and clomipramine. Efficacy was evaluated by the Trichotillomania Severity Scale, the Trichotillomania Impairment Scale, and the Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, which were conducted by an independent assessor blinded to the treatment condition. RESULTS: CBT had a dramatic effect in reducing symptoms of trichotillomania and was significantly more effective than clomipramine (p = .016) or placebo (p = .026). Clomipramine resulted in symptom reduction greater than that with placebo, but the difference fell short of statistical significance. Placebo response was minimal. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be aware of the potential treatments available for trichotillomania. A larger and more definitive study comparing CBT and a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor is indicated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4088/jcp.v61n0111

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ninan, P. T., Rothbaum, B. O., Marsteller, F. A., Knight, B. T., & Eccard, M. B.
Affiliations
Emory University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Published
2000-01-15
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
47-50
ISSN
0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2993744382
Cited by
303
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 37
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
trichotillomania, cognitive behavioral therapy, clomipramine, habit reversal, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, placebo response, treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Adult, Clomipramine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Severity of Illness Index, Trichotillomania, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review