Cited by 424Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersHair Growth and DisordersBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies

N-Acetylcysteine, a Glutamate Modulator, in the Treatment of Trichotillomania: A Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

Grant, Jon E., Odlaug, Brian L., Won Kim, Suck·2009·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Context Trichotillomania is characterized by repetitive hair pulling that causes noticeable hair loss. Data on the pharmacologic treatment of trichotillomania are limited to conflicting studies of serotonergic medications. N-acetylcysteine, an amino acid, seems to restore the extracellular glutamate concentration in the nucleus accumbens and, therefore, offers promise in the reduction of compulsive behavior. Objective To determine the efficacy and tolerability of N-acetylcysteine in adults with trichotillomania. Design Twelve-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Setting Ambulatory care center. Patients Fifty individuals with trichotillomania (45 women and 5 men; mean [SD] age, 34.3 [12.1] years). Interventions N-acetylcysteine (dosing range, 1200-2400 mg/d) or placebo was administered for 12 weeks. Main outcome measures Patients were assessed using the Massachusetts General Hospital Hair Pulling Scale, the Clinical Global Impression scale, the Psychiatric Institute Trichotillomania Scale, and measures of depression, anxiety, and psychosocial functioning. Outcomes were examined using analysis of variance modeling analyses and linear regression in an intention-to-treat population. Results Patients assigned to receive N-acetylcysteine had significantly greater reductions in hair-pulling symptoms as measured using the Massachusetts General Hospital Hair Pulling Scale (P Conclusions This study, the first to our knowledge that examines the efficacy of a glutamatergic agent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.60

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • N-acetyl cysteine has shown evidence of efficacy in double-blind placebo-controlled studies for trichotillomania and skin-picking disorder.

    “The glutamate modulator n‐acetyl cysteine has shown evidence of efficacy, in double‐blind placebo‐controlled studies, for OC‐related disorders trichotillomania and skin‐picking disorder”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, J. E., Odlaug, B. L., & Won Kim, S.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2009-07-01
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
756
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038083244
Cited by
424
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 29
FWCI
29.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Hair Growth and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Keywords
trichotillomania, N-acetylcysteine, glutamate modulation, glutamatergic agents, compulsive behavior, hair pulling, nucleus accumbens, pharmacotherapy, treatment efficacy, tolerability, depression, anxiety, psychosocial functioning
MeSH terms
Acetylcysteine, Adolescent, Adult, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Trichotillomania, Excitatory Amino Acid Agents, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review