Cited by 22Health Policy Implementation SciencePsychiatric care and mental health servicesPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

System-Level Influences on the Sustainability of a Cognitive Therapy Program in a Community Behavioral Health Network

Open access
Stirman, Shannon Wiltsey, Matza, Alexis, Gamarra, Jennifer, Toder, Katherine, Xhezo, Regina, Evans, Arthur C., Hurford, Matthew, Beck, Aaron T. +2 more·2015·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine influences on the sustainability of a program to implement an evidence-based psychotherapy in a mental health system. METHODS: Interviews with program administrators, training consultants, agency administrators, and supervisors (N=24), along with summaries of program evaluation data and program documentation, were analyzed with a directed content-analytic approach. RESULTS: Findings suggested a number of interconnected and interacting influences on sustainability, including alignment with emerging sociopolitical influences and system and organizational priorities; program-level adaptation and evolution; intervention flexibility; strong communication, collaboration, planning, and support; and perceived benefit. These individual factors appeared to mutually influence one another and contribute to the degree of program sustainability achieved at the system level. Although most influences were positive, financial planning and support emerged as potentially both facilitator and barrier, and evaluation of benefits at the patient level remained a challenge. CONCLUSIONS: Several factors appeared to contribute to the sustainability of a psychosocial intervention in a large urban mental health system and warrant further investigation. Understanding interconnections between multiple individual facilitators and barriers appears critical to advancing understanding of sustainability in dynamic systems and adds to emerging recommendations for other implementation efforts. In particular, implications of the findings include the importance of implementation strategies, such as long-term planning, coalition building, clarifying roles and expectations, planned adaptation, evaluation, diversification of financing strategies, and incentivizing implementation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201400147

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Program evaluation has been consistently recognized in the literature as a key ingredient for program sustainment.

    “Program evaluation has been consistently recognized in the literature as a key ingredient for program sustainment [18, 21, 56].”

    From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links evaluation to sustainability frameworks and suggests that evaluation processes may help sustain implementation programs. The Results also describe evaluation in this program. The paper does not establish the broader claim that the literature has consistently recognized program evaluation as a key ingredient for sustainment. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Most prior sustainability studies included small, homogeneous samples and based conclusions mostly on qualitative retrospective assessments rather than statistical tests of association.

    “However, this knowledge is greatly limited because most studies included small, homogeneous samples, and their conclusions were mostly based on qualitative retrospective assessments of individuals’ beliefs about what led to sustainment success or failure, rather than based on statistical tests of their association [17–22].”

    From Using qualitative comparative analysis to uncover multiple pathways to program sustainment: implications for community-based youth substance misuse prevention (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results describe a small sample of 24 administrators, consultants, and supervisors. Methods > Analysis describes qualitative coding of interviews and documents, while the Discussion says the design cannot establish associations with quantitative sustainability measures. This paper illustrates much of the cited limitation, but its participants held varied roles, some interviews occurred as training began, and a single study cannot establish that most prior studies had these characteristics. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These results reinforce the multidimensional and interactive nature of sustainability capacity domains and their role in program sustainment.

    “These results reinforce the multidimensional and interactive nature of sustainability capacity domains and their role in program sustainment [21, 27, 30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [23]Institute of Medicine Treatment for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Military and Veteran Populations: Final Assessment Washington, DC National Academies Press 2014 25077185

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stirman, S. W., Matza, A., Gamarra, J., Toder, K., Xhezo, R., Evans, A. C., Hurford, M., Beck, A. T., Crits-Christoph, P., & Creed, T.
Affiliations
Boston University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2015-07-01
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
734-742
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2008294770
Cited by
20
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH080100, K99/R00 MH 080100, K99MH080100, R25MH080916)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
program sustainability, cognitive therapy, evidence-based psychotherapy, implementation strategies, organizational priorities, sociopolitical influences, intervention adaptation, financial planning, coalition building
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Pennsylvania, Program Evaluation, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Community Networks, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review