Cited by 68Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDigital Mental Health Interventions

Randomized controlled trial of an internet-based cognitive-behavioral treatment program for binge-eating disorder

Wagner, Birgit, Nagl, Michaela, Dölemeyer, Ruth, Klinitzke, Grit, Steinig, Jana, Hilbert, Anja, Kersting, Anette·2016·Behavior Therapy

Abstract

Binge-eating disorder (BED) is a prevalent health condition associated with obesity. Few people with BED receive appropriate treatment. Personal barriers include shame, fear of stigma, geographic distance to mental health services, and long wait-lists. The aims of this study were to examine the efficacy of an Internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention for adults with threshold BED (DSM-IV) and to examine the stability of treatment effects over 12months. Participants were randomly assigned to a 16-week Internet-based cognitive-behavioral intervention (n=69) or a wait-list condition (n=70). Binge-eating frequency and eating disorder psychopathology were measured with the Eating Disorder Examination-Questionnaire and the Eating Disorder Examination administered over the telephone. Additionally, body weight and body mass index, depression, and anxiety were assessed before and immediately after treatment. Three-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up data were recorded in the treatment group. Immediately after the treatment the number of binge-eating episodes showed significant improvement (d=1.02, between group) in the treatment group relative to the wait-list condition. The treatment group had also significantly reduced symptoms of all eating psychopathology outcomes relative to the wait-list condition (0.82≤d≤1.11). In the treatment group significant improvement was still observed for all measures 1year after the intervention relative to pretreatment levels. The Internet-based intervention proved to be efficacious, significantly reducing the number of binge-eating episodes and eating disorder pathology long term. Low-threshold e-health interventions should be further evaluated to improve treatment access for patients suffering from BED.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.beth.2016.01.006

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, B., Nagl, M., Dölemeyer, R., Klinitzke, G., Steinig, J., Hilbert, A., & Kersting, A.
Affiliations
  • MSB Medical School Berlin (DE)
  • University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
  • IFB Adiposity Diseases (DE)
  • Leipzig University (DE)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Birgit
Venue
Behavior Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-07
Volume
47
Issue
4
Pages
500-514
ISSN
0005-7894 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2285481096
Cited by
68
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavior Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (01EO1001)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
binge eating disorder, internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy, digital health interventions, binge eating frequency, eating disorder psychopathology, treatment efficacy, long-term treatment outcomes, obesity, treatment access barriers, anxiety and depression
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Internet, Young Adult, Binge-Eating Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review