Cited by 38Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

A tale of two systems: Testing a positive and negative valence systems framework to understand social disconnection across anxiety and depressive disorders

Open access
Taylor, Charles T., Pearlstein, Sarah L., Stein, Murray B.·2020·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Social disconnection is a common and pernicious feature of anxiety and depressive disorders, yet is insufficiently addressed by our best available treatments. To better understand why people with anxiety and depression feel socially disconnected, we tested a positive and negative valence systems framework informed by research on how normative social connections develop and flourish.Method Individuals seeking treatment for anxiety or depression (N = 150) completed measures of perceived social connectedness, positive and negative valence temperament, social goals, affect, symptoms, and life satisfaction.Results Feeling less socially connected was associated with diminished life satisfaction, beyond clinical symptom severity. Regression analyses revealed that both diminished positive valence and heightened negative valence temperament, and their corresponding motivational and affective outputs, were significantly and uniquely (with no significant interaction between them) associated with lower perceived connectedness.Limitations Data was cross-sectional and based on self-report-limiting conclusions about causality and social disconnection processes at different units of analysis.Conclusions Understanding social disconnection through the lens of a positive and negative valence systems framework may inform transdiagnostic models and treatment approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.041

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, C. T., Pearlstein, S. L., & Stein, M. B.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Charles T.
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-04
Volume
266
Pages
207-214
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2999014664
Cited by
38
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain and Behavior Research Foundation (21695)
  • University of California, San Diego (UL1TR001442)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R00MH090243, R61MH113769)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social disconnection, social connectedness, anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, positive valence systems, negative valence systems, temperament, life satisfaction, social goals, transdiagnostic model
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review