Cited by 539Cerebrovascular and genetic disordersDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAdvanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Classification of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in elderly persons

Open access
Kim, Ki Woong, MacFall, James R., Payne, Martha E.·2008·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

White matter lesions, commonly seen on MRIs of elderly people, are related to various geriatric disorders, including cerebrovascular diseases, cardiovascular diseases, dementia, and psychiatric disorders. Currently, white matter lesions are divided into periventricular white matter lesions and deep white matter lesions. Although the meaning of these terms varies by study and this dichotomization itself is still in debate, a possible dissimilarity in pathogenic mechanisms between periventricular white matter lesions and deep white matter lesions are providing some clues for understanding pathophysiology of many geriatric syndromes associated with white matter lesions. We have reviewed the distinctions between periventricular white matter lesions and deep white matter lesions in terms of etiology, histopathology, functional correlates, and imaging methodologies. We suggest a new subclassification of white matter lesions that might have better etiological and functional relevance than the current simple dichotomization. The new categories are juxtaventricular, periventricular, deep white, and juxtacortical. This new classification scheme might contribute to reducing the heterogeneity of white matter lesion findings in future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2008.03.024

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, K. W., MacFall, J. R., & Payne, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Payne, Martha E.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-08
Volume
64
Issue
4
Pages
273-280
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002514626
Cited by
539
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH60451, P50MH060451)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Keywords
white matter lesions, periventricular white matter lesions, deep white matter lesions, older adults, geriatric syndromes, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, histopathology, pathophysiology
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Brain Injuries, Cerebral Ventricles, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Geriatric Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review