Cited by 134Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Evidence of white matter tract disruption in MRI hyperintensities

Taylor, Warren D, Payne, Martha E, Krishnan, K.Ranga Rama, Wagner, H.Ryan, Provenzale, James M, Steffens, David C, MacFall, James R·2001·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of brain tissue measures the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), or isotropic diffusion, and anisotropy, or diffusion as influenced by tissue structure. We hypothesized that hyperintensities, when compared with normal tissue by DTI, would show evidence of damage through an increased ADC and decreased anisotropy. We also hypothesized that DTI changes in hyperintensities would be similar between depressed subjects and control subjects.Methods Fourteen depressed geriatric patients and nineteen control subjects received DTI. The ADC and aniso-tropy of normal tissue from standard regions were compared with hyperintensities from these regions. The Students' t test compared individual regions and averaged white matter results.Results Hyperintensities showed higher ADC and lower anisotropy than normal regions. Gray matter exhibited similar trends. There was no significant difference in diffusion characteristics of hyperintensities between subjects and control subjects.Conclusions Hyperintensities damage the structure of brain tissue, and do so comparably in depressed subjects and control subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0006-3223(01)01160-x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Major fibre tracts such as the forceps major and forceps minor, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus as well as the posterior cingulum show white matter alterations in Alzheimer's disease dementia.

    “In particular, major fibre tracts such as the forceps major and forceps minor, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus as well as the posterior cingulum show white matter alterations in Alzheimer’s disease dementia (Taylor et al., 2001; Teipel et al., 2002; Douaud et al., 2011; Mito et al., 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Taylor, W. D., Payne, M. E., Krishnan, K. R. R., Wagner, H. R., Provenzale, J. M., Steffens, D. C., & MacFall, J. R.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Taylor, Warren D
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
179-183
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039717395
Cited by
134
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01 MH-54846, P30MH040159, P30 MH 40159, R01MH054846)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
white matter hyperintensities, diffusion tensor imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, anisotropy, brain tissue damage, depression, geriatric depression, gray matter
MeSH terms
Aged, Brain, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Severity of Illness Index, Anisotropy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review