Cited by 60Animal testing and alternativesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Meeting report: can we make animal models of human mental illness?

Open access
Monteggia, Lisa M., Heimer, Hakon, Nestler, Eric J.·2018·Biological Psychiatry

Abstract

Modeling aspects of the human condition in animals has provided invaluable information on the physiology of all organ systems and has assisted in the development of virtually all new therapeutics. Research in cardiovascular disease, cancer, immunology, and other disciplines has benefited substantially from the availability of animal models that capture aspects of specific human diseases and that have been used effectively to advance new treatments. By comparison, animal models for neurological and psychiatric disorders have faced several unique obstacles. This paper highlights topics covered in a recent Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory meeting charged with examining the status of animal models for mental illness. The consensus of the conference is that despite the difficulties inherent with modeling brain disorders in animals, when used judiciously-fully cognizant that models of specific behavioral or biological aspects cannot completely recapitulate the human disorder-animal research is crucial for advancing our understanding of neuropsychiatric disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.02.010

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [1]Banbury Center Reports (2016): Can we make animal models of human mental illness? A Critical Review. 8 21–23, 2016, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Monteggia, L. M., Heimer, H., & Nestler, E. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Nestler, Eric J.
Venue
Biological Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
84
Issue
7
Pages
542-545
ISSN
0006-3223 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2790249888
Cited by
60
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 6
FWCI
7.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biological Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (P50MH096890, R01MH051399)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P01DA008227)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
animal models of psychiatric disorders, mental illness, neuropsychiatric disorders, psychiatric neuroscience, translational research, behavioral models, brain disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Mental Disorders, Congresses as Topic, Disease Models, Animal, Models, Genetic, Nervous System Diseases, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review