Cited by 106Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlEmotion and Mood RecognitionDeception detection and forensic psychology

Up- and down-regulating facial disgust: affective, vagal, sympathetic, and respiratory consequences

Demaree, Heath A., Schmeichel, Brandon J., Robinson, Jennifer L., Pu, Jie, Everhart, D. Erik, Berntson, Gary G.·2006·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Relative to watching in a natural manner, people asked to suppress or exaggerate their facial response to a negative emotional stimulus experience greater activation of the sympathetic nervous system but report a similar subjective emotional experience. The present research extends prior research on response modulation in two important ways. First, discrete indicators of cardiac vagal and sympathetic control (respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and pre-ejection period (PEP), respectively) were included as dependent measures along with interbeat interval (IBI) and skin conductance (EDR). Second, to help generalize results across response-focused modulation techniques, participants suppressed, exaggerated, or exerted no control over their responses while watching a disgust-eliciting film (for control purposes, a fourth group was asked to watch a neutral film naturally). Response modulation was associated with significantly decreased PEP (increased cardiac sympathetic control) relative to those in the natural-watch conditions. All participants evidenced increased EDR while watching the disgusting clip, but facial modulation did not produce EDR reactivity beyond that of watching the disgusting film naturally. Exaggerators experienced decreased IBI during modulation (perhaps due to increased muscle contraction) whereas all other groups showed increased IBI (i.e., the orienting response). Neither emotional experience nor facial modulation reliably impacted RSA, respiration rate, or…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.02.006

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Emotion suppression (the conscious inhibition of emotion-expressive behavior during an emotion episode) is associated with increased sympathetic activation of the cardiovascular system relative to uninstructed responding.

    “Previous research has shown that inhibiting emotion-expressive behavior (emotion suppression) leads to increased sympathetic activation of the cardiovascular system (Gross & Levenson, 1993).”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Demaree, et al., 2006

  • The paper's physiological findings are consistent with previous research showing that facial modulation of disgust is associated with increased cardiac sympathetic control but not with respiratory activation, electrodermal activation, or cardiac vagal control.

    “Our physiological findings are consistent with previous research showing that facial modulation of disgust is associated with increased cardiac sympathetic control but not with respiratory activation, electrodermal activation, or cardiac vagal control (Demaree, et al., 2006).”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Demaree, et al., 2006

  • Suppressing emotional facial behavior does not reduce negative emotional experience.

    “consistent with previous findings that suppressing emotional facial behavior does not reduce negative emotional experience (Demaree, et al., 2006; Gross, 1998; Gross & Levenson, 1993, 1997).”

    From Cardiovascular costs of emotion suppression cross ethnic lines. (2008) · cites this paper as Demaree, et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Demaree, H. A., Schmeichel, B. J., Robinson, J. L., Pu, J., Everhart, D. E., & Berntson, G. G.
Affiliations
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • Texas A&M University (US)
  • East Carolina University (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Demaree, Heath A.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-01
Volume
71
Issue
1
Pages
90-99
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994362964
Cited by
106
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Deception detection and forensic psychology
Keywords
response modulation, cardiac vagal control, sympathetic nervous system, respiratory sinus arrhythmia, pre-ejection period, skin conductance, RR interval, respiration rate, emotional experience, orienting response, disgust
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Electrocardiography, Facial Expression, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Periodicity, Respiration, Sympathetic Nervous System, Vagus Nerve, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review