Cited by 256Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesEmotions and Moral Behavior

Cognitive reappraisal of negative affect: Converging evidence from EMG and self-report

Open access
Ray, Rebecca D., McRae, Kateri, Ochsner, Kevin N., Gross, James J.·2010·Emotion

Abstract

Prior psychophysiological studies of cognitive reappraisal have generally focused on the down-regulation of negative affect, and have demonstrated either changes in self-reports of affective experience, or changes in facial electromyography, but not both. Unfortunately, when taken separately, these measures are vulnerable to different sources of bias, and alternative explanations might account for changes in these indicators of negative affect. What is needed is a study that (a) obtains measures of self-reported affect together with facial electromyography, and (b) examines the use of reappraisal to regulate externally and internally generated affective responses. In the present study, participants up- or down-regulated negative affect in the context of both negative and neutral pictures. Up-regulation led to greater self reports of negative affect, as well as greater corrugator and startle responses to both negative and neutral stimuli. Down-regulation led to lesser reports of negative affect, and lesser corrugator responses to negative and neutral stimuli. These results extend prior research by (a) showing simultaneous effects on multiple measures of affect, and (b) demonstrating that cognitive reappraisal may be used both to regulate responses to negative stimuli and to manufacture a negative response to neutral stimuli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0019015

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reappraisal decreases the experience of negative emotion and the associated sympathetic response.

    “Reappraisal was shown to decrease the experience of negative emotion (e.g., [23,24,25,26,27]) and of the associated sympathetic response (e.g., [24,25,27]).”

    From Effects of differential strategies of emotion regulation (2019) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Abstract reports that down-regulation reduced self-reported negative affect and corrugator EMG responses. It does not report a reduction in sympathetic response: the measured physiological responses were EMG and startle eyeblink, and the Discussion says startle did not significantly decrease. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, R. D., McRae, K., Ochsner, K. N., & Gross, J. J.
Affiliations
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Emotion
Published
2010
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
587-592
ISSN
  • 1528-3542 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-1516
OpenAlex
W2065043907
Cited by
256
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emotion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (MH66957; MH58147; MH76074)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
cognitive reappraisal, negative affect, emotion regulation, corrugator supercilii, startle response, facial electromyography, self-reported affect, neutral stimuli
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Cognition, Electromyography, Emotions, Female, Humans, Self Disclosure, Reflex, Startle, Down-Regulation, Young Adult, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review