Cited by 43Occupational Health and PerformanceStress Responses and CortisolHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control

Stress hormones and vascular function in firefighters during concurrent challenges

Webb, Heather E., Garten, Ryan S., McMinn, David R., Beckman, Jamie L., Kamimori, Gary H., Acevedo, Edmund O.·2011·Biological Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of concurrent physical and mental challenge on stress hormones and indicators of vascular function in firefighters. Twelve professional firefighters exercised at 60% VO(2max) while participating in a computerized Fire Strategies and Tactics Drill (FSTD-fire strategies condition [FSC]), and again at the same intensity without the mental challenge (EAC). No differences in the amount of work performed between conditions existed, although the FSC resulted in greater perceptions of overall workload. Epinephrine and norepinephrine demonstrated significant interaction effects with elevated levels during the FSC. Cortisol responses were significantly elevated across time and for the FSC. Positive correlations were found between cortisol and interleukin-6, endothelin-1, and thromboxane-B(2), and a negative correlation between interleukin-6 and thromboxane-B(2). These results suggest that concurrent challenges results in exacerbated responses of stress hormones and suggests mechanisms that could contribute to the prevalence of cardiovascular events among firefighters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.02.024

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Webb, H. E., Garten, R. S., McMinn, D. R., Beckman, J. L., Kamimori, G. H., & Acevedo, E. O.
Affiliations
  • Mississippi State University (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Greensboro (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • Walter Reed Army Institute of Research (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Webb, Heather E.
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-04
Volume
87
Issue
1
Pages
152-160
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1988039057
Cited by
43
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
11.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • National Center for Research Resources (P20RR0167475-03)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Keywords
firefighters, stress hormones, vascular function, epinephrine, norepinephrine, cortisol, interleukin-6, endothelin-1, thromboxane B2, cardiovascular risk, perceived workload
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena, Catecholamines, Employment, Epinephrine, Physical Exertion, Female, Fires, Hematocrit, Hemoglobins, Hormones, Humans, Norepinephrine, Oxygen Consumption, Statistics as Topic, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review