Cited by 84Stress Responses and CortisolAdrenal Hormones and DisordersNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Editorial: Ultradian, circadian, and stress–related hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis activity–a dynamic digital–to–analog Modulation

Chrousos, George P.·1998·Endocrinology

Abstract

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis helps to maintain basal and stress-related homeostasis of central nervous system (CNS), cardiovascular, metabolic, and immune functions (1, 2). Disregulation of this axis is involved in several behavioral, circulatory, endocrine/metabolic and immune disorders. In this issue of the journal, Windle et al. (3) report a detailed assessment of the ultradian rhythmicity of corticosterone secretion in the rat. Using an automated, frequent blood sampling technique, they demonstrated that the end-hormone of the HPA axis was secreted in an ultradian pulsatile fashion, with secretory episodes occurring in a constant frequency but with a variable amplitude. The nocturnal circadian rise of corticosterone secretion resulted from increases in the amplitude of the pulses, whereas a brief stressor increased or failed to stimulate the secretion of corticosterone, depending on its timing, during or after a secretory episode, respectively. These findings make a lot of sense and merit commentary. The main regulation of the ultradian, circadian, and stress-related activity of the HPA axis occurs at the level of the hypothalamus, in particular the parvocellular components of the paraventricular (PVN) nuclei (1, 2). There, a finite number of neurons produce and secrete CRH and arginine vasopressin (AVP) into the hypophyseal portal system (Fig. 1). The majority of these neurons secrete CRH or AVP, whereas a minority secretes both neuropeptides. CRH and AVP appear to enhance the activity of each other and they synergistically stimulate ACTH secretion by corticotroph cells (4–6). In certain situations, AVP secreted by collateral neuronal fibers of magnocellular neurons from the PVN and/or supraoptic (SON) nuclei participates in ACTH stimulation (7). Studies from experimental animals and humans have suggested that both parvocellular CRH and AVP are secreted in an ultradian pulsatile fashion and participate in the generation of a circadian ACTH and cortisol rhythm and in the elevation of the concentrations of these hormones during acute stress, by increasing the amplitude rather than the frequency of their ultradian secretory episodes (8–15). In the early 1980s, when ovine (o) and human (h) CRH became available for clinical studies and development of specific RIAs, Schulte et al. (12) administered large doses of oCRH as a continuous infusion to normal male volunteers. The circulating levels of oCRH attained were approximately 10 times higher than the concentrations of this neuropeptide in the hypophyseal portal system of rats. In response to these constantly elevated levels of oCRH, the frequently measured plasma ACTH and cortisol concentrations were increased, however, they retained their ultradian pulsatile and circadian patterns of secretion. These data suggested that a second CRF was secreted in an ultradian pulsatile and circadian fashion, which allowed retention of the typical secretory pattern of these hormones, in spite of the constant exposure of the corticotroph to high concentrations of CRH. Subsequent studies in rats (9, 11), sheep (10), horses (8), monkeys (14), and humans (13, 15) suggested that CRH and AVP are both secreted episodically at the relatively constant and similar frequencies of 1 to 3 secretory episodes per hour, with a temporal overlap of approximately 80% (Fig. 2A). The synchrony and amplitudes of these pulsations increase, the latter severalfold, in a circadian fashion and during stress (Fig. 2B). Thus, the generation of the baseline ultradian pattern of the activity of the HPA axis depends on a relatively constant oscillation of the parvocellular CRH, AVP, and CRH/AVP neurons, with the superimposition of several constitutive inputs, all expressed primarily as changes in amplitude (1, 2). These include: positive circadian input(s) from one or more pacemakers, tonic positive input from the locus caeruleus/norepinephrine (LC/NE) and dopaminergic mesocorticolimbic systems, tonic negative input from the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex and negative feedback input from the arcuate nucleus-POMC-peptidergic system and the end-hormone of the HPA axis cortisol or corticosterone, depending on the species. It appears that the CRH component of the HPA axis is more sensitive to the suppressive effect of glucocorticoids than the AVP component, and this includes not only the secretion of CRH vs. AVP but also the ability of these hormones to stimulate ACTH secretion; the hypothalamic magnocellular AVP-secreting neurons, on the other hand, may not be suppressed by glucocorticoids (16, 17). The generation of the stress-related increase in the activity of the HPA axis also depends on the relatively constant ultradian oscillation of the parvocellular CRH, AVP, and CRH/AVP neurons, and the superimposition of stress-related inputs, resulting in amplitude increases (1, 2). These are exerted directly and/or via activation of the locus caeruleus/norepinephrine (LC/NE) system and inclu

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endo.139.2.5857

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CRH and AVP are both required as stimulatory inputs to corticotrope cells for a complete ACTH response in physiologically normal and various stressful conditions.

    “In essence, CRH and AVP are both required as stimulatory inputs to corticotrope cells for a complete ACTH response in physiologically normal as well as in various stressful conditions (32, 38, 48–51).”
  • The frequency of ultradian oscillations is rather insensitive to stress whereas the amplitude increases as a consequence of stress.

    “According to Chrousos [10], the frequency of the ultradian oscillations are rather insensitive to stress whereas the amplitude increases as a consequence of stress.”
  • The secretion of cortisol exhibits both circadian and ultradian oscillations.

    “The secretion of cortisol has been studied in many cases revealing both circadian and ultradian oscillations in the concentration [8, 9, 10, 16, 41].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chrousos, G. P.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Chrousos, George P.
Venue
Endocrinology
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
139
Issue
2
Pages
437-440
ISSN
  • 0013-7227 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7170
OpenAlex
W2041030937
Cited by
83
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, ultradian rhythms, circadian rhythm, corticosterone secretion, pulsatile hormone secretion, paraventricular nucleus, vasopressin, corticotropin-releasing factor, ACTH secretion, stress response
MeSH terms
Activity Cycles, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Hypothalamo-Hypophyseal System, Pituitary-Adrenal System, Stress, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review