Cited by 68Schizophrenia research and treatmentNeural dynamics and brain functionNeuroscience and Music Perception

A predictive coding account of MMN reduction in schizophrenia

Wacongne, Catherine·2016·Biological Psychology

Abstract

The mismatch negativity (MMN) is thought to be an index of the automatic activation of a specialized network for active prediction and deviance detection in the auditory cortex. It is consistently reduced in schizophrenic patients and has received a lot of interest as a clinical and translational tool. The main neuronal hypothesis regarding the mechanisms leading to a reduced MMN in schizophrenic patients is a dysfunction of NMDA receptors (NMDA-R). However, this hypothesis has never been implemented in a neuronal model. In this paper, we examine the consequences of NMDA-R dysfunction in a neuronal model of MMN based on predictive coding principle. I also investigate how predictive processes may interact with synaptic adaptation in MMN generations and examine the consequences of this interaction for the use of MMN paradigms in schizophrenia research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.10.011

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrophysiological studies investigating neural responses to deviant stimuli, such as the mismatch negativity, suggest a hierarchical organization of prediction and prediction error signaling.

    “Electrophysiological studies investigating neural responses to deviant stimuli, such as the mismatch negativity (MMN), suggest a hierarchical organization of prediction and PE signaling (32–34).”

    From The Predictive Coding Account of Psychosis (2018) · cites this paper as [33]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wacongne, C.
Affiliations
Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Corresponding author
Wacongne, Catherine
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
116
Pages
68-74
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2178409791
Cited by
68
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
4.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • KNAW Research Portal (The Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
mismatch negativity, schizophrenia, predictive coding, NMDA receptor dysfunction, neuron models, auditory cortex, deviance detection, synaptic adaptation, auditory event-related potentials
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Auditory Cortex, Evoked Potentials, Auditory, Humans, Schizophrenia, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review