Cited by 11Attachment and Relationship DynamicsFace Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Attachment styles have a modulatory impact on psychophysiological arousal evoked by reciprocated and unreciprocated gaze

Prinsen, Jellina, Deschepper, Annelore, Maes, Elisa, Alaerts, Kaat·2019·Biological Psychology

Abstract

Gaze processing plays an essential role during social interactions. Here, it was investigated whether variations in attachment style (secure, anxious and avoidant) were associated with differential expressions of sympathetic autonomic arousal upon live dyadic gaze interactions. To do so, 47 participants were presented with either reciprocated or unreciprocated eye gaze from a live model and skin conductance responses (SCRs) were collected. In line with previous observations, SCRs and subjective ratings of arousal were higher in response to reciprocated, compared to unreciprocated gaze. In terms of the modulation by attachment style, it was shown that participants with low attachment security and high attachment avoidance displayed overall higher sympathetic arousal upon the presentation of the live dyadic gaze cues, irrespective of whether the observed model showed reciprocal or unreciprocated gaze. Together, these observations indicate that attachment styles have a modulatory effect on individuals' psychophysiological responses to dyadic gaze interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.107773

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinsen, J., Deschepper, A., Maes, E., & Alaerts, K.
Affiliations
KU Leuven (BE)
Corresponding author
Alaerts, Kaat
Venue
Biological Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-11
Volume
148
Pages
107773
ISSN
0301-0511 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2974673290
Cited by
11
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biological Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • KU Leuven (STG/14/001)
  • The Branco Weiss Fellowship – Society in Science
  • Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
  • Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (KAN 1506716N, G079017N, KAN 1521313N)
  • Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
  • Marguerite-Marie Delacroix foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
attachment styles, gaze, sympathetic activation, skin conductance response, attachment avoidance, attachment anxiety, social interaction, psychophysiological arousal
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Autonomic Nervous System, Female, Fixation, Ocular, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Object Attachment, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review