Cited by 209Algal biology and biofuel productionMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBiodiesel Production and Applications

Technoeconomic analysis of five microalgae-to-biofuels processes of varying complexity

Amer, Luke, Adhikari, Birendra, Pellegrino, John·2011·Bioresource Technology

Abstract

The economics surrounding five algae-to-fuels process scenarios were examined. The different processes modeled were as follows: an open pond producing either triacylglycerides (TAG) or free fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), a solar-lit photobioreactor producing either FAME or free fatty acids (FFA), and a light emitting diode irradiated (LED-lighted) photobioreactor producing TAG. These processes were chosen to represent both classical and esoteric approaches presented in the open literature. Viable (or suggested) processing techniques to liberate and purify (and convert) the microalgal triacylglycerides were then modeled to accompany each growth option. The investment and cost per kg of fuel or fuel precursor for each process was determined. The open pond produced TAG at ∼$7.50/kg, while the process using the LED-lit photobioreactor produced TAG at ∼$33/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FAME at ∼$25/kg, while the open pond produced FAME at ∼$4/kg. The scenario containing the solar-lit photobioreactor produced FFA at ∼$29/kg. The open pond scenarios appear to be closest to the $1/kg pricepoint at this time, and thus are the most viable economic options. Future technological advancements that reduce the cost of bioreactor vessels, LED lighting, and solvent recovery, may reduce the oil production costs of these scenarios to a more attractive level.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.08.010

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The average price of algae biodiesel grown in a photobioreactor is $4.93, which is 66% more than in an open-pond system that is $2.97 L-1.

    “The average price of algae biodiesel grown in a photobioreactor is $4.93, which is 66% more than in an open-pond system that is $2.97 L -1 .”

    From The Perspective of Large-Scale Production of Algae Biodiesel (2020) · cites this paper as [78]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Amer, L., Adhikari, B., & Pellegrino, J.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Pellegrino, John
Venue
Bioresource Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-10
Volume
102
Issue
20
Pages
9350-9359
ISSN
0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167335661
Cited by
209
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioresource Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
ConocoPhillips
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biodiesel Production and Applications
Keywords
microalgal biofuels, triglycerides, free fatty acids, open pond cultivation, photobioreactors, fuel production costs, solvent recovery
MeSH terms
Anaerobiosis, Centrifugation, Esterification, Hydrolysis, Photochemistry, Bioreactors, Biofuels, Microalgae

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review