Cited by 233Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalPesticide and Herbicide Environmental StudiesEnvironmental remediation with nanomaterials

Kinetics, thermodynamics and mechanistic studies of carbofuran removal using biochars from tea waste and rice husks

Open access
Vithanage, Meththika, Mayakaduwa, S.S., Herath, Indika, Ok, Yong Sik, Mohan, Dinesh·2016·Chemosphere

Abstract

This study reports the thermodynamic application and non-linear kinetic models in order to postulate the mechanisms and compare the carbofuran adsorption behavior onto rice husk and tea waste derived biochars. Locally available rice husk and infused tea waste biochars were produced at 700 °C. Biochars were characterized by using proximate, ultimate and surface characterization methods. Batch experiments were conducted at 25, 35, and 45 °C for a series of carbofuran solutions ranging from 5 to 100 mg L(-1) with a biochar dose of 1 g L(-1) at pH 5.0 with acetate buffer. Molar O/C ratios indicated that rice husk biochar (RHBC700) is more hydrophilic than tea waste biochar (TWBC700). Negative ΔG (Gibbs free energy change) values indicated the feasibility of carbofuran adsorption on biochar. Increasing ΔG values with the rise in temperature indicated high favorability at higher temperatures for both RHBC and TWBC. Enthalpy values suggested the involvement of physisorption type interactions. Kinetic data modeling exhibited contribution of both physisorption, via pore diffusion, π*-π electron donor-acceptor interaction, H-bonding, and van der Waals dispersion forces and chemisorption via chemical bonding with phenolic, and amine groups. Equilibrium adsorption capacities of RHBC and TWBC determined by pseudo second order kinetic model were 25.2 and 10.2 mg g(-1), respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.11.002

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vithanage, M., Mayakaduwa, S. S., Herath, I., Ok, Y. S., & Mohan, D.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Fundamental Studies (LK)
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Jawaharlal Nehru University (IN)
Corresponding author
Vithanage, Meththika
Venue
Chemosphere
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-05
Volume
150
Pages
781-789
ISSN
0045-6535 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2175523292
Cited by
233
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7
FWCI
8.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Chemosphere (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
World Health Organization
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Adsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Environmental remediation with nanomaterials
Keywords
carbofuran, pesticide adsorption, biochar, rice husk biochar, adsorption kinetics, adsorption thermodynamics, pseudo-second-order kinetics, physisorption, chemisorption, adsorption mechanism, agricultural waste valorization
MeSH terms
Adsorption, Carbofuran, Charcoal, Kinetics, Oryza, Temperature, Thermodynamics, Waste Products, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Camellia sinensis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review