The DOI matches its Crossref record; 106 of the 106 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sustainable food waste management towards circular bioeconomy: Policy review, limitations and opportunities
Abstract
Research attention is increasingly drawn on constructing a circular bioeconomy and enhancing the value of material flows. Circular bioeconomy aims to achieve sustainable consumption and production with reduction of greenhouse gas emission. This study identifies research gaps on how circular bioeconomy can be achieved through sustainable food waste management by comparing the similarities and differences in concepts of bioeconomy and circular economy, reviewing the benefits and limitations of the existing policies, and evaluating the global situations of food waste and its management on household and commercial basis to promote circular bioeconomy. Future development on food waste management is expected to capitalise on the multi-functionality of products, boundary and allocation in a circular system, and trade-off between food waste and resources. With future technological advances, food waste management in circular bioeconomy policy can facilitate the accomplishment of sustainable development goals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 · Cited by 5,089
The Theory of Planned Behaviour
Conner, M. T., & McMillan, B. (2004) · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) · Cited by 4,457
(2011) · FAO eBooks · Cited by 3,368
Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050
Parfitt, J., Barthel, M., & Macnaughton, S. (2010) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 · Cited by 3,197
Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks
Hockstad, L., & Hanel, L. (2018) · University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas) · doi:10.15485/1464240 · Cited by 2,821
Kummu, M., de Moel, H., Porkka, M., Siebert, S., Varis, O., & Ward, P. J. (2012) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.08.092 · Cited by 1,300
Lin, C. S. K., Pfaltzgraff, L. A., Herrero-Davila, L., Mubofu, E. B., Abderrahim, S., Clark, J. H., Koutinas, A. A., Kopsahelis, N., Stamatelatou, K., Dickson, F., et al. (2013) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c2ee23440h · Cited by 1,137
Determinants of consumer food waste behaviour: Two routes to food waste
Stancu, V., Haugaard, P., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.08.025 · Cited by 1,098
Cited by
The significance of biomass in a circular economy
Sherwood, J. (2020) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122755 · Cited by 517
Galanakis, C. M., Rizou, M., Aldawoud, T. M. S., Ucak, I., & Rowan, N. J. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.002 · Cited by 437
Sustainable processing of food waste for production of bio-based products for circular bioeconomy
Sharma, P., Gaur, V. K., Sirohi, R., Varjani, S., Hyoun Kim, S., & Wong, J. W. C. (2021) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124684 · Cited by 365
Pulsed electric field: A potential alternative towards a sustainable food processing
Arshad, R. N., Abdul-Malek, Z., Roobab, U., Munir, M. A., Naderipour, A., Qureshi, M. I., El-Din Bekhit, A., Liu, Z.-W., & Aadil, R. M. (2021) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2021.02.041 · Cited by 293
Obaideen, K., Abdelkareem, M. A., Wilberforce, T., Elsaid, K., Sayed, E. T., Maghrabie, H. M., & Olabi, A. G. (2022) · Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers · doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104207 · Cited by 279
Metadata
- Authors
- Mak, T. M. W., Xiong, X., Tsang, D. C. W., Yu, I. K. M., & Poon, C. S.
- Venue
- Bioresource Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-02
- Volume
- 297
- Pages
- 122497
- ISSN
- 0960-8524 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2989788549
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 106
- FWCI
- 84.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sustainable food waste management towards circular bioeconomy: Policy review, limitations and opportunities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122497
- The paper
- Mak, T. M. W., Xiong, X., Tsang, D. C. W., Yu, I. K. M., & Poon, C. S. (2020). Sustainable food waste management towards circular bioeconomy: Policy review, limitations and opportunities. Bioresource Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122497
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
