Cited by 172Molecular Junctions and NanostructuresBiofield Effects and BiophysicsNanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies

Atomic water channel controlling remarkable properties of a single brain microtubule: Correlating single protein to its supramolecular assembly

Open access
Sahu, Satyajit, Ghosh, Subrata, Ghosh, Batu, Aswani, Krishna, Hirata, Kazuto, Fujita, Daisuke, Bandyopadhyay, Anirban·2013·Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Abstract

Microtubule nanotubes are found in every living eukaryotic cells; these are formed by reversible polymerization of the tubulin protein, and their hollow fibers are filled with uniquely arranged water molecules. Here we measure single tubulin molecule and single brain-neuron extracted microtubule nanowire with and without water channel inside to unravel their unique electronic and optical properties for the first time. We demonstrate that the energy levels of a single tubulin protein and single microtubule made of 40,000 tubulin dimers are identical unlike conventional materials. Moreover, the transmitted ac power and the transient fluorescence decay (single photon count) are independent of the microtubule length. Even more remarkable is the fact that the microtubule nanowire is more conducting than a single protein molecule that constitutes the nanowire. Microtubule's vibrational peaks condense to a single mode that controls the emergence of size independent electronic/optical properties, and automated noise alleviation, which disappear when the atomic water core is released from the inner cylinder. We have carried out several tricky state-of-the-art experiments and identified the electromagnetic resonance peaks of single microtubule reliably. The resonant vibrations established that the condensation of energy levels and periodic oscillation of unique energy fringes on the microtubule surface, emerge as the atomic water core resonantly integrates all proteins around it such that the nanotube irrespective of its size functions like a single protein molecule. Thus, a monomolecular water channel residing inside the protein-cylinder displays an unprecedented control in governing the tantalizing electronic and optical properties of microtubule.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bios.2013.02.050

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum conductance through photosynthesis protein is enhanced by mechanical vibration, and microtubules appear to have their own mechanical vibrations in megahertz.

    “Quantum conductance through photosynthesis protein is enhanced by mechanical vibration [126], and microtubules appear to have their own set of mechanical vibrations (e.g. in megahertz as suggested by Sahu et al. [88,89]).”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [88]

    Section 2.2 describes vibrational modes characteristic of microtubules and relates them to elastic-string properties. Sections 2.5–2.6 report electrical resonance measurements and mention an external MHz source, but the passages do not establish that the microtubules’ mechanical vibrations themselves occur at MHz frequencies. The photosynthesis-protein clause is attributed to a different citation, not this paper. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Electronic conductance along microtubules, normally extremely good insulators, becomes exceedingly high, approaching quantum conductance, at certain specific resonance frequencies of applied AC stimulation.

    “First, they found that electronic conductance along microtubules, normally extremely good insulators, becomes exceedingly high, approaching quantum conductance, at certain specific resonance frequencies of applied alternating current (AC) stimulation.”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [88]

    Section 2.5 reports sharp increases in conductivity at specific AC resonance frequencies and says the microtubule transmits the signal with less than 0.04 Ω resistance. But the paper does not describe this as approaching quantum conductance, and Section 2.4 says classifying a microtubule as an insulator is incorrect, contrary to the claim that microtubules are normally extremely good insulators. Page numbers are unavailable in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Gigahertz excitations in MTs may be interpreted as coherent photons.

    “the detection of gigahertz excitations in MTs by Bandyopadhyay's group, which may be interpreted as coherent photons [88,89].”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [88]

    Section 2.5 reports measured AC resonance peaks in a single microtubule, and the Fig. 5 caption describes measurements extending to 1.3 GHz. The paper does not interpret those gigahertz resonances as coherent photons; its discussion of coherent vibration and photon counting in Section 2.2 concerns separate optical measurements. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Coherent gigahertz, megahertz and kilohertz excitations have been found in single microtubules.

    “Bandyopadhyay's group has found coherent gigahertz, megahertz and kilohertz excitations in single MTs [88,89].”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [88]

    Section 2.5 reports resonance peaks in a single-microtubule device, and the Fig. 5 caption gives a measurement range of 1 kHz to 1.3 GHz. Section 2.2 describes coherent vibrations, but does not establish that the measured electrical resonances across the kilohertz, megahertz and gigahertz bands are coherent excitations; the Conclusion describes studying those peaks for coherence as future work. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Bandyopadhyay's recent results show electrical resistance drops dramatically at specific frequencies, largely temperature- and length-independent.

    “electrical resistance drops dramatically, at certain very specific frequencies, in a largely-temperature independent and length-independent way.”

    From Consciousness in the universe (2014) · cites this paper as [88]

    Section 2.5 reports a sharp increase in conductivity at resonance frequencies, near-zero resistance to an AC signal at particular frequencies, and AC power transmission independent of microtubule length. It does not establish that the frequency-specific resistance drop is largely temperature-independent; Section 2.4 instead describes conductivity changing under thermal noise and heating. The indexed passages provide no page number for these sections. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Agarwal, R., Barrelet, C.J., Lieber, C.M., 2005. Nano Letters 5, 917-920.
  2. Bandyopadhyay, A., Miki, K., Wakayama, Y., 2006. Applied Physics Letters 89, 243503-243506.
  3. Bandyopadhyay, A., Wakayama, Y., 2007. Applied Physics Letters 90, 023512-023514.
  4. Borisy, G., Marcum, J., Olmsted, J., Murphy, D., Johnson, K., 1975. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 253, 107-132.
  5. Bandyopadhyay, A., Acharya, S., 2008. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (2008), 3668-3672.
  6. Carlier, M., Melki, R., Pantaloni, D., Hill, T., Chen, Y., 1987. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 84, 5257-5261.
  7. Dierolf, V., Koerdt, M., 2000. Physical Review B 61, 8043-8052.
  8. Egard, M., Johansson, S., Johansson, A.C., Persson, K.M., Dey, A., Borg, B., Thelander, C., Wernersson, L.E., Lind, E., 2010. Nano Letters 10, 809-812.
  9. Fygenson, D.K., Braun, E., Libchaber, A., 1994. Physical Review E 50, 1579-1588.
  10. He, R., Feng, X., Roukes, M., Yang, P., 2008. Nano Letters 8, 1756-1761.
  11. Moriya, S., Tanaka, K., Ohkuma, M., Sugano, S., Kudo, T., 2001. Journal of Molecular Evolution 52, 6-16.
  12. Mesquita, M.V., Vasconcellos, A.R., Luzzi, R., 1993. Physical Review E 48, 4049-4059.
  13. Moskalenko, S., Miglei, M., Khadshi, P., Pokatilov, E., Kiselyova, E., 1980. Physics Letters A 76, 197-200.
  14. Michalski, P., Mele, E.J., 2008. Physical Review B 77, 085429.
  15. Makarovski, A., Zhukov, A., Liu, J., Finkelstein, G., 2007. Physical Review B 76, R161405.
  16. Minoura, I., Muto, E., 2006. Biophysics Journal 90, 3739-3748.
  17. Prodan, E., Prodan, C., 2009. Physical Review Letters 103, 248101.
  18. Pizzi, R., Strini, G., Fiorentini, S., Pappalardo, V., Pregnolato M., 2011. Focus on Artificial Neural Networks cap. In: Flores John, A. (Ed.), ISBN: 978-1-61324-285- 8. Nova Science Publisher Inc., vol. 9, pp. 191-207.
  19. Priel, A., Ramos, A.J., Tuszynski, J.A., Cantiello, H.F., 2006. Biophysics Journal 90, 4639-4643.
  20. Rakitin, A., Aich, P., Papadopoulos, C., Kobzar, Y., Vedeneev, A., Lee, J., Xu, J., 2001. Physical Review Letters 86, 3670-3673.
  21. Storm, A., Van Noort, J., De Vries, S., Dekker, C., 2001. Applied Physics Letters 79, 3881-3883.
  22. Szendro, P., Vincze, G., Szasz, A., 2001a. European Biophysics Journal 30, 227-231.
  23. Sahu, S., Ghosh, S., Fujita, D., Bandyopadhyay, A., 2011. Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 8, 509-515.
  24. Samitsu, S., Shimomura, T., Ito, K., Fujimori, M., Heike, S., Hashizume, T., 2005. Applied Physics Letters 86, 233103.
  25. Tran, P., Walker, R., Salmon, E., 1997. Journal of Cell Biology 138, 105-117.
  26. van Vugt, L.K., Zhang, B., Piccione, B., Spector, A.A., Agarwal, R., 2009. Nano Letters 9, 1684-1688.
  27. Zhang, Y., Austin, R., Kraeft, J., Cox, E., Ong, N., 2002. Physical Review Letters 89, 198102.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sahu, S., Ghosh, S., Ghosh, B., Aswani, K., Hirata, K., Fujita, D., & Bandyopadhyay, A.
Affiliations
National Institute for Materials Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Bandyopadhyay, Anirban
Venue
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
47
Pages
141-148
ISSN
0956-5663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2048182751
Cited by
172
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biosensors and Bioelectronics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Asian Office of Aerospace Research and Development
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • National Institute for Materials Science
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Molecular Junctions and Nanostructures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biofield Effects and Biophysics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies
Keywords
microtubules, tubulin, electronic properties, optical properties, vibrational modes, electromagnetic resonance, fluorescence decay, single photon counting, noise reduction, supramolecular self-assembly, brain neurons
MeSH terms
Brain, Kinetics, Microtubules, Tubulin, Water, Nanotubes, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review