Cited by 1113D Printing in Biomedical ResearchMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications

Real-time and non-invasive impedimetric monitoring of cell proliferation and chemosensitivity in a perfusion 3D cell culture microfluidic chip

Lei, Kin Fong, Wu, Min-Hsien, Hsu, Che-Wei, Chen, Yi-Dao·2014·Biosensors and Bioelectronics

Abstract

A perfusion three-dimensional (3D) cell culture microfluidic chip has been developed for real-time and non-invasive impedimetric monitoring of cell proliferation and chemosensitivity. In this study, human oral cancer cells (OEC-M1) were encapsulated in 3D agarose scaffold and cultured in a miniaturized chamber under perfusion of tested substance. This setting provides a more in vitro physiologically relevant microenvironment to better mimic the complex in vivo microenvironment. A pair of vertical electrodes was embedded at the opposite sidewalls of the culture chamber for the on-site impedance measurement. Cell density in the 3D construct was shown to be proportional to the impedance magnitude of the entire construct. Therefore, perfusion 3D cell culture was performed for up to 5 days and cell proliferation can be monitored by the impedimetric analysis. Moreover, real-time impedimetric monitoring of cell viability under the perfusion of anti-cancer drug in different concentrations was conducted and the impedance magnitude was directly correlated with the cell viability. From the confirmation of the endpoint cell viability assays, a concentration-dependent effect was shown; however, the response of cell viability during the drug treatment was able to be traced by the impedance measurement. The experimental results showed that cell proliferation and chemosensitivity in 3D cell culture format can be monitored by impedance measurement. This microfluidic chip has a high potential to develop a powerful analytical platform for cancer research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bios.2013.07.031

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • 2D and 3D cell cultures are suitable for exploring cellular responses to drugs, toxins, and biomaterials.

    “Although 2D and 3D cell cultures are suitable for exploring cellular responses to drugs, toxins, and biomaterials, 77 only 3D cultures exhibit a hierarchical structure and cellular heterogeneity that can closely mimic in vivo cell morphology and function (proliferation, differentiation, gene expression, etc.), 78,79 cell-cell interactions, and diffusion barriers.”
  • 3D models can better replicate intrinsic physiological conditions and in vivo cellular responses to external stimuli compared to the 2D monolayer.

    “Therefore, 3D models can better replicate intrinsic physiological conditions and in vivo cellular responses to external stimuli compared to the 2D monolayer. 77,78,80-82”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lei, K. F., Wu, M.-H., Hsu, C.-W., & Chen, Y.-D.
Affiliations
Chang Gung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Lei, Kin Fong
Venue
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-01
Volume
51
Pages
16-21
ISSN
0956-5663 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995746991
Cited by
111
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biosensors and Bioelectronics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Keywords
cell proliferation, chemosensitivity, microfluidics, oral cancer cells, cell viability, anticancer drug response, impedance measurement, anticancer drug screening
MeSH terms
Antineoplastic Agents, Cell Survival, Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor, Equipment Design, Humans, Mouth Neoplasms, Sepharose, Biosensing Techniques, Electric Impedance, Cell Culture Techniques, Cell Line, Tumor, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Cell Proliferation, Tissue Scaffolds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review