Cited by 132Enhanced Recovery After SurgeryDiabetes Treatment and ManagementAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

Perioperative management of long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists: concerns for delayed gastric emptying and pulmonary aspiration

Open access
van Zuylen, Mark L., Siegelaar, Sarah E., Plummer, Mark P., Deane, Adam M., Hermanides, Jeroen, Hulst, Abraham H.·2024·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Prescriptions and use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are increasing dramatically, as indications are expanding from the treatment of diabetes mellitus to weight loss for people with obesity. As GLP-1 receptor agonists delay gastric emptying, perioperative healthcare practitioners could be concerned about an increased risk for pulmonary aspiration during general anaesthesia. We summarise relevant medical literature and provide evidence-based recommendations for perioperative care for people taking GLP-1 receptor agonists. GLP-1 receptor agonists delay gastric emptying; however, ongoing treatment attenuates this effect. The risk of aspiration during general anaesthesia is unknown. However, we advise caution in patients who recently commenced on GLP-1 receptor agonists. After over 12 weeks of treatment, standard fasting times likely suffice to manage the risk of pulmonary aspiration for most otherwise low-risk patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bja.2024.01.001

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Initial guidance from multiple societies advocated a conservative strategy of temporary discontinuation for safety considerations.

    “the initial guidance for preoperative management of GLP-1 RAs advocated a conservative strategy, recommending temporary discontinuation for safety considerations.”

    From Delayed gastric emptying induced by glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and its implications for perioperative risk during anesthesia (2026) · cites this paper as [5]

    The Abstract (page unavailable) reports guidance to hold once-daily GLP-1 receptor agonists for one day and once-weekly agents for one week before elective surgery, based on case reports of pulmonary aspiration. The References identify American Society of Anesthesiologists guidance, but the passages do not establish that multiple societies issued the initial guidance. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The ASA and BJA published clinical recommendations in 2023 and 2024 addressing the perioperative management of patients treated with GLP-1 RAs.

    “The ASA and the British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) published clinical recommendations in 2023 and 2024, respectively, addressing the perioperative management of patients treated with GLP-1 RAs [4,5].”
  • In the gastrointestinal tract, GLP-1 acts on myoenteric neurons and inhibits vagal activity, thereby delaying gastric emptying and lowering gastric acid secretion, which promotes satiety and reduces caloric intake.

    “In the GI tract, GLP-1 acts on myoenteric neurons and inhibits vagal activity, thereby delaying gastric emptying and lowering gastric acid secretion, which further promotes satiety and reduces caloric intake [38,39]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van Zuylen, M. L., Siegelaar, S. E., Plummer, M. P., Deane, A. M., Hermanides, J., & Hulst, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • The University of Adelaide (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
  • Siegelaar, Sarah E.
  • Plummer, Mark P.
  • Deane, Adam M.
  • Hermanides, Jeroen
  • Hulst, Abraham H.
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
132
Issue
4
Pages
644-648
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391303884
Cited by
132
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 27
FWCI
55.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (101024833)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, perioperative care, gastric emptying, pulmonary aspiration, general anesthesia, preoperative fasting, diabetes mellitus, obesity, weight loss
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Gastroparesis, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review