Cited by 60Diabetes Treatment and ManagementAirway Management and Intubation TechniquesGastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and risk of pulmonary aspiration or discontinuation of procedure: cohort study

Open access
Alkabbani, Wajd, Suissa, Karine, Gu, Kristine D, Cromer, Sara J, Paik, Julie M, Bykov, Katsiaryna, Hobai, Ion, Thompson, Christopher C +2 more·2024·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy is associated with increased risk of pulmonary aspiration or discontinuation of the procedure compared with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors. Design: Cohort study. Setting: Two deidentified US commercial healthcare databases. Participants: 43 365 adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes who used a GLP-1 receptor agonist or SGLT-2 inhibitor within 30 days before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was pulmonary aspiration on the day of or the day after endoscopy, defined using diagnostic codes. The secondary outcome was discontinuation of endoscopy. Risk ratios and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated after fine stratification weighting based on propensity score. Results: After weighting, 24 817 adults used a GLP-1 receptor agonist (mean age 59.9 years; 63.6% female) and 18 537 used an SGLT-2 inhibitor (59.8 years; 63.7% female). Among users of GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors, the weighted risk per 1000 people was, respectively, 4.15 and 4.26 for pulmonary aspiration and 9.79 and 4.91 for discontinuation of endoscopy. Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitor use, GLP-1 receptor agonist use was not associated with an increased risk of pulmonary aspiration (pooled risk ratio 0.98, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.31), although it was associated with a higher risk for discontinuation of endoscopy (1.99, 1.56 to 2.53). Conclusions: In this comparative cohort study, no increased risk of pulmonary aspiration during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was observed among adults with type 2 diabetes using GLP-1 receptor agonists compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors within 30 days of the procedure; however, GLP-1 receptor agonists were associated with a higher risk of discontinuation of endoscopy, possibly owing to a higher risk of retained gastric content. In the absence of evidence from randomized trials, these findings could inform future practice recommendations on the preprocedural protocol for patients requiring endoscopy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj-2024-080340

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bohman JK, Jacob AK, Nelsen KA, et al. Incidence of Gastric- to-Pulmonary Aspiration in Patients Undergoing Elective Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;16:1163-4. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2017.11.024 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alkabbani, W., Suissa, K., Gu, K. D., Cromer, S. J., Paik, J. M., Bykov, K., Hobai, I., Thompson, C. C., Wexler, D. J., & Patorno, E.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Patorno, Elisabetta
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2024-10-22
Volume
387
Pages
e080340
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403639005
Cited by
60
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 4
FWCI
19.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases
  • National Institute on Aging
  • American Diabetes Association
  • Food and Drug Administration
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal Bleeding Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, pulmonary aspiration, type 2 diabetes, endoscopy safety, propensity score weighting, type 3 diabetes
MeSH terms
Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal, Respiratory Aspiration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review