Repetitive picture processing: autonomic and cortical correlates.
Abstract
Emotionally arousing pictures elicit larger late positive potentials (LPPs) than neutral pictures during passive viewing. Moreover, these cortical responses do not rely on voluntary evaluation of the hedonic content and are relatively unaffected by task demands. In this study, we examined modulation of the late positive potential as it varies with stimulus repetition. Three pictures (pleasant, neutral, unpleasant) were presented up to 60 times each. Although the amplitude of the late positive potential during picture viewing declined with stimulus repetition, affective modulation remained intact. On the other hand, autonomic responses (skin conductance and heart rate change) habituated rapidly with stimulus repetition. These findings suggest that while stimulus detection and categorization, reflected in the LPP, is mandatory, autonomic modulation reflects initial orienting responses that habituate rapidly.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The LPP is responsible for recognizing and categorizing stimuli.
“The LPP is responsible for recognizing and categorizing the stimuli (Codispoti et al., 2006).”
From Repetitive Religious Chanting Modulates the Late-Stage Brain Response to Fear- and Stress-Provoking Pictures (2017) · cites this paper as Codispoti et al., 2006
The lack of significant GSR difference between conditions may be partly due to GSR rapidly declining after repetition of IAPS negative pictures.
“The GSR measurement did not show significant difference between conditions; this may be partly due to that the GSR could rapidly decline after the repetition of IAPS negative pictures (Codispoti et al., 2006).”
From Repetitive Religious Chanting Modulates the Late-Stage Brain Response to Fear- and Stress-Provoking Pictures (2017) · cites this paper as Codispoti et al., 2006
Cites
A new method for off-line removal of ocular artifact
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1983) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/0013-4694(83)90135-9 · Cited by 5,055 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Affective picture processing: An integrative review of ERP findings
Olofsson, J. K., Nordin, S., Sequeira, H., & Polich, J. (2008) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006 · Cited by 1,595 · see citing works
Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review
Hajcak, G., MacNamara, A., & Olvet, D. M. (2010) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565640903526504 · Cited by 1,370 · see citing works
Emotion and the motivational brain
Lang, P. J., & Bradley, M. M. (2010) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007 · Cited by 1,006 · see citing works
Pozharliev, R., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Van Strien, J. W., & Bagozzi, R. P. (2015) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmr.13.0560 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films
Uhrig, M. K., Trautmann, N., Baumgärtner, U., Treede, R.-D., Henrich, F., Hiller, W., & Marschall, S. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
The development of fear learning and generalization in 8-13 year-olds
Glenn, C. R., Klein, D. N., Lissek, S., Britton, J. C., Pine, D. S., & Hajcak, G. (2012) · Developmental Psychobiology · doi:10.1002/dev.20616 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Gao, J., Fan, J., Wu, B. W., Halkias, G. T., Chau, M., Fung, P. C., Chang, C., Zhang, Z., Hung, Y.-S., & Sik, H. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02055 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Fitzgerald, J. M., Gorka, S. M., Kujawa, A., DiGangi, J. A., Proescher, E., Greenstein, J. E., Aase, D. M., Schroth, C., Afshar, K., Kennedy, A. E., et al. (2018) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2017.11.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Gender moderates valence effects on the late positive potential to emotional distracters
Syrjänen, E., & Wiens, S. (2013) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.07.018 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
- Authors
- Codispoti, M., Ferrari, V., & Bradley, M. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Codispoti, Maurizio
- Venue
- Brain Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 1068
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 213-220
- ISSN
- 0006-8993 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2082388711
- Cited by
- 261
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 5.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Brain Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
- Keywords
- late positive potential, stimulus repetition, habituation, emotional arousal, autonomic responses, skin conductance, heart rate, orienting response, emotional modulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Arousal, Autonomic Nervous System, Cerebral Cortex, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Visual Perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
