Cited by 184Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Emotion Elicitation: A Comparison of Pictures and Films

Open access
Uhrig, Meike K., Trautmann, Nadine, Baumgärtner, Ulf, Treede, Rolf-Detlef, Henrich, Florian, Hiller, Wolfgang, Marschall, Susanne·2016·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Pictures and film clips are widely used and accepted stimuli to elicit emotions. Based on theoretical arguments it is often assumed that the emotional effects of films exceed those of pictures, but to date this assumption has not been investigated directly. The aim of the present study was to compare pictures and films in terms of their capacity to induce emotions verified by means of explicit measures. Stimuli were (a) single pictures presented for 6 s, (b) a set of three consecutive pictures with emotionally congruent contents presented for 2 s each, (c) short film clips with a duration of 6 s. A total of 144 participants rated their emotion and arousal states following stimulus presentation. Repeated-measures ANOVAs revealed that the film clips and 3-picture version were as effective as the classical 1-picture method to elicit positive emotions, however, modulation toward positive valence was little. Modulation toward negative valence was more effective in general. Film clips were less effective than pictorial stimuli in producing the corresponding emotion states (all p < 0.001) and were less arousing (all p ≤ 0.02). Possible reasons for these unexpected results are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00180

Cites

49 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Video clips are more effective at inducing emotions because they are more reflective of real life.

    “On the one hand, video clips are more effective at inducing emotions because they are more reflective of real life24.”

    From A Multimodal Dataset for Mixed Emotion Recognition (2024) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction presents films’ similarity to real life as a theoretical argument, not an established reason they induce emotions more effectively. The Abstract reports that film clips were less effective than pictures at producing corresponding emotional states, and the Conclusions say they did not appear to be better than pictures. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Uhrig, M. K., Trautmann, N., Baumgärtner, U., Treede, R.-D., Henrich, F., Hiller, W., & Marschall, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Tübingen (DE)
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
Corresponding author
Uhrig, Meike K.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2016-02-17
Volume
7
Pages
180-180
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2299687099
Cited by
184
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB-1158, KFO-256)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
emotion induction, visual stimuli, emotional valence, arousal, positive emotions, negative emotions, stimulus presentation duration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review