Cited by 184Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Narrative exposure therapy for political imprisonment-related chronic posttraumatic stress disorder and depression

Bichescu, Dana, Neuner, Frank, Schauer, Maggie, Elbert, Thomas·2007·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The psychological consequences of traumatic stress may last even into old age. In persons in their 60s and 70s who had been victims of political detention and torture four decades ago, we compared the outcome of narrative exposure therapy (NET) to that of psychoeducation (PED) only. From a group of 59 former political detainees, 18 who fulfilled the full PTSD criteria according to the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) were offered and accepted participation in the treatment study. The participants were randomly assigned to either one session of PED (n=9) or five sessions of NET (n=9). Symptoms of PTSD (CIDI) and depression (Beck Depression Inventory, BDI) were assessed prior to treatment and after a 6-month follow-up. NET but not PED produced a significant reduction in post-traumatic symptoms and depression scores. Four out of 9 of those who completed NET, compared to 8/9 of those within the PED group, still had PTSD 6 months after the treatment had ended. These results indicate that NET may lead to the alleviation of post-traumatic and depression symptoms even when the conditions persist for excessive time periods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2006.12.006

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bichescu, D., Neuner, F., Schauer, M., & Elbert, T.
Affiliations
University of Konstanz (DE)
Corresponding author
Bichescu, Dana
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-09
Volume
45
Issue
9
Pages
2212-2220
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109263612
Cited by
183
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 6
FWCI
10.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
  • Publikationen an der Universität Bielefeld (Universität Bielefeld) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
narrative exposure therapy, political imprisonment, chronic posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, torture survivors, political prisoners, psychoeducation
MeSH terms
Aged, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Politics, Prisoners, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Survivors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review