Cited by 108Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaMental Health Treatment and Access

Mental health and psychosocial support programmes for adults in humanitarian emergencies: A systematic review and meta-analysis in low and middle-income countries

Open access
Bangpan, Mukdarut, Felix, Lambert, Dickson, Kelly·2019·BMJ Global Health

Abstract

Background: Humanitarian emergencies are a major global health challenge with the potential to have a profound impact on people’s mental and psychological health. Effective interventions in humanitarian settings are needed to support the mental health and psychosocial needs of affected populations. To fill this gap, this systematic review synthesises evidence on the effectiveness of a wide range of mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) programmes delivered to adults affected by humanitarian emergencies in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Methods: A comprehensive search of 12 electronic databases, key websites and citation checking was undertaken in 2015 and updated in May 2018. We included controlled trials published in English from 1980. We extracted data and assessed risk of bias prior to performing a meta-analysis using random effects models. When meta-analysis was not used, we narratively described individual trial effect sizes using forest plots. Results: Thirty-five studies were included. Overall, MHPSS programmes show benefits in improved functioning and reducing post-traumatic stress disorder. There are also indications from a limited pool of evidence that cognitive–behavioural therapy and narrative exposure therapy may improve mental health conditions. Other psychotherapy modalities also showed a positive trend in favour of MHPSS programmes for improving several mental health outcomes. Conclusion: In addition to MHPSS programme for improving mental health outcomes in adults affected by humanitarian emergencies in LMICs, there is also a need to generate robust evidence to identify potential impact on broader social dimensions. Doing so could aid the future development of MHPSS programmes and ensure their effective implementation across different humanitarian contexts in LMICs. Future research on MHPSS programmes which focus on basic services and security, community and family programmes, their cost-effectiveness and mechanisms of impact could also strengthen the MHPSS evidence base to better inform policy and practice decision-making in humanitarian settings. Protocol registration number: CRD42016033578.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001484

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. [4]Eapsg Prioritization of themes and research questions for health outcomes in natural disasters, humanitarian crises or other major healthcare emergencies. PLOS Currents Disasters, 2013. PMC3805831 24162731
  2. [8]van Ommeren M, Saxena S, Saraceno B Mental and social health during and after acute emergencies: emerging consensus? Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83: 71– 5. discussion 5-6 doi:/S0042-96862005000100017 15682252 PMC2623467
  3. [9]Gouweloos J, Dückers M, te Brake H, et al Psychosocial care to affected citizens and communities in case of CBRN incidents: a systematic review. Environ Int 2014; 72: 46– 65. 10.1016/j.envint.2014.02.009 24684819 · DOI
  4. [12]Burkey MD, Hosein M, Morton I, et al Psychosocial interventions for disruptive behaviour problems in children in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Child Psychol Psychiatr 2018; 59: 982– 93. 10.1111/jcpp.12894 29633271 · DOI
  5. [14]Purgato M, Gross AL, Betancourt T, et al Focused psychosocial interventions for children in low-resource humanitarian settings: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2018; 6: e390– 400. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30046-9 29530422 · DOI
  6. [15]Strohmeier H, Scholte WF Trauma-Related mental health problems among national humanitarian staff: a systematic review of the literature. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2015; 6: 28541 10.3402/ejpt.v6.28541 26589256 PMC4654769 · DOI
  7. [16]Greene MC, Jordans MJD, Kohrt BA, et al Addressing culture and context in humanitarian response: preparing desk reviews to inform mental health and psychosocial support. Confl Health 2017; 11: 21 10.1186/s13031-017-0123-z 29163666 PMC5686886 · DOI
  8. [17]Augustinavicius JL, Greene MC, Lakin DP, et al Monitoring and evaluation of mental health and psychosocial support programs in humanitarian settings: a scoping review of terminology and focus. Confl Health 2018; 12: 9 10.1186/s13031-018-0146-0 29560023 PMC5858133 · DOI
  9. [20]Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med 2009; 6: e1000097 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 19621072 PMC2707599 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [21]Higgins JPT, Green S Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Higgins JPT, Green S, Wiley Online Library, 2011.
  11. [22]Bangpan M, Felix L, Chiumento A, et al The impact of mental health and psychosocial support interventions on people affected by humanitarian emergencies: a systematic review protocol. Oxfam: Oxford, GB, 2016.
  12. [23]Rehberg K Revisting therapeutic governance: the politics of mental health and psychosocial programmes in humanitarian settings. Refugee studies centre, Oxford Department of International Development, 2014.
  13. [26]Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Ansari MT, et al Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update. J Clin Epidemiol 2015; 68: 1312– 24. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.023 25721570 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [28]Sutcliffe K, Thomas J, Stokes G, et al Ica): a pragmatic approach for identifying the critical features of complex interventions. Syst Rev 2015; 4. PMC4627414 26514644
  15. [30]Bass J, Poudyal B, Tol W, et al A controlled trial of problem-solving counseling for war-affected adults in Aceh, Indonesia. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2012; 47: 279– 91. 10.1007/s00127-011-0339-y 21246186 · DOI
  16. [32]Becker SM Psychosocial care for women survivors of the tsunami disaster in India. Am J Public Health 2009; 99: 654– 8. 10.2105/AJPH.2008.146571 19150896 PMC2661489 · DOI
  17. [33]Hagl M, Powell S, Rosner R, et al Dialogical exposure with traumatically bereaved Bosnian women: findings from a controlled trial. Clin Psychol Psychother 2015; 22 10.1002/cpp.1921 25256361 · DOI
  18. [35]Scholte WF, Verduin F, Kamperman AM, et al The effect on mental health of a large scale psychosocial intervention for survivors of mass violence: a quasi-experimental study in Rwanda. PLoS One 2011; 6: e21819 10.1371/journal.pone.0021819 21857908 PMC3152564 · DOI
  19. [36]Sonderegger R, Rombouts S, Ocen B, et al Trauma rehabilitation for war-affected persons in northern Uganda: a pilot evaluation of the empower programme. Br J Clin Psychol 2011; 50: 234– 49. 10.1348/014466510X511637 21810104 · DOI
  20. [37]Yeomans PD, Forman EM, Herbert JD, et al A randomized trial of a reconciliation workshop with and without PTSD psychoeducation in Burundian sample. J Trauma Stress 2010; 23: 305– 12. 20564362
  21. [39]Acarturk C, Konuk E, Cetinkaya M, et al EMDR for Syrian refugees with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: results of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Eur J Psychotraumatol 2015; 6: 6 10.3402/ejpt.v6.27414 PMC4438099 25989952 · DOI
  22. [40]Ayoughi S, Missmahl I, Weierstall R, et al Provision of mental health services in resource-poor settings: a randomised trial comparing counselling with routine medical treatment in North Afghanistan (Mazar-e-Sharif). BMC Psychiatry 2012; 12: 14 10.1186/1471-244X-12-14 22375947 PMC3314541 · DOI · Paper page
  23. [42]Bass J, Murray SM, Mohammed TA, et al A randomized controlled trial of a trauma-informed support, skills, and psychoeducation intervention for survivors of torture and related trauma in Kurdistan, Northern Iraq. Glob Health Sci Pract 2016; 4: 452– 66. 10.9745/GHSP-D-16-00017 27609624 PMC5042700 · DOI
  24. [43]Mughal U, Carrasco D, Brown R, et al Rehabilitating civilian victims of war through psychosocial intervention in Sierra Leone. J Appl Soc Psychol 2015; 45: 593– 601. 10.1111/jasp.12322 · DOI
  25. [44]Oflaz F, Hatipoğlu S, Aydin H Effectiveness of psychoeducation intervention on post-traumatic stress disorder and coping styles of earthquake survivors. J Clin Nurs 2008; 17: 677– 87. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02047.x 18279300 · DOI
  26. [46]Weiss WM, Murray LK, Zangana GAS, et al Community-Based mental health treatments for survivors of torture and Militant attacks in southern Iraq: a randomized control trial. BMC Psychiatry 2015; 15 10.1186/s12888-015-0622-7 PMC4605204 26467303 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [47]Steinert C, Bumke PJ, Hollekamp RL, et al Resource activation for treating post-traumatic stress disorder, co-morbid symptoms and impaired functioning: a randomized controlled trial in Cambodia. Psychol Med 2017; 47: 553– 64. 10.1017/S0033291716002592 27804900 · DOI
  28. [51]Jacob N, Neuner F, Maedl A, et al Dissemination of psychotherapy for trauma spectrum disorders in postconflict settings: a randomized controlled trial in Rwanda. Psychother Psychosom 2014; 83: 354– 63. 10.1159/000365114 25323203 · DOI
  29. [52]Vijayakumar L, Kumar MS Trained volunteer-delivered mental health support to those bereaved by Asian tsunami--an evaluation. Int J Soc Psychiatry 2008; 54: 293– 302. 10.1177/0020764008090283 18720890 · DOI · Paper page
  30. [55]Telles S, Singh N, Joshi M, et al Post traumatic stress symptoms and heart rate variability in Bihar flood survivors following yoga: a randomized controlled study. BMC Psychiatry 2010; 10: 18 10.1186/1471-244X-10-18 20193089 PMC2836997 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [58]Connolly S, Sakai C Brief trauma intervention with Rwandan genocide-survivors using thought field therapy. Int J Emerg Ment Health 2011; 13: 161– 72. 22708146
  32. [59]Bryant RA, Ekasawin S, Chakrabhand S, et al A randomized controlled effectiveness trial of cognitive behavior therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in terrorist-affected people in Thailand. World Psychiatry 2011; 10: 205– 9. 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2011.tb00058.x 21991280 PMC3188775 · DOI
  33. [60]Hewage K, Steel Z, Mohsin M, et al A wait-list controlled study of a trauma-focused cognitive behavioral treatment for intermittent explosive disorder in Timor-Leste. Am J Orthopsychiatry 2018; 88: 282– 94. 10.1037/ort0000280 28749158 · DOI
  34. [61]Zang Y, Hunt N, Cox T A randomised controlled pilot study: the effectiveness of narrative exposure therapy with adult survivors of the Sichuan earthquake. BMC Psychiatry 2013; 13: 41 10.1186/1471-244X-13-41 23363689 PMC3570314 · DOI
  35. [62]Zang Y, Hunt N, Cox T Adapting narrative exposure therapy for Chinese earthquake survivors: a pilot randomised controlled feasibility study. BMC Psychiatry 2014; 14: 262 10.1186/s12888-014-0262-3 25927297 PMC4189751 · DOI
  36. [63]Esala JJ, Taing S Testimony therapy with ritual: a pilot randomized controlled Trial*. J Trauma Stress 2017; 30: 94– 8. 10.1002/jts.22163 28084662 · DOI
  37. [64]Jiang R, Tong H, Delucchi KL, et al Interpersonal psychotherapy versus treatment as usual for PTSD and depression among Sichuan earthquake survivors: a randomized clinical trial. Confl Health 2014; 8: 14 10.1186/1752-1505-8-14 25254070 PMC4172897 · DOI
  38. [65]de J, Knipscheer Jeroen W, Ford N, et al The efficacy of psychosocial interventions for adults in contexts of ongoing man-made Violence—A systematic review. Health 2014; 2014.
  39. [66]Dossa NI, Hatem M Cognitive-Behavioral therapy versus other PTSD psychotherapies as treatment for women victims of war-related violence: a systematic review. ScientificWorldJournal 2012; 2012: 1– 19. 10.1100/2012/181847 PMC3345529 22629120 · DOI
  40. [67]Lambert JE, Alhassoon OM Trauma-focused therapy for refugees: meta-analytic findings. J Couns Psychol 2015; 62: 28– 37. 10.1037/cou0000048 25485547 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [68]Lorenc T, Felix L, Petticrew M, et al Meta-Analysis, complexity, and heterogeneity: a qualitative interview study of researchers' methodological values and practices. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 192 10.1186/s13643-016-0366-6 27852314 PMC5112624 · DOI
  42. [69]Herrman H, Jané-Llopis E The status of mental health promotion. Public Health Rev 2012; 34: 6 10.1007/BF03391674 15966252 · DOI
  43. [70]Ampuero D, Goldswosthy S, Delgado LE, et al Using mental well-being impact assessment to understand factors influencing well-being after a disaster. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 2015; 33: 184– 94. 10.1080/14615517.2015.1023564 · DOI
  44. [71]Dickson K, Bangpan M What are the barriers to, and facilitators of, implementing and receiving MHPSS programmes delivered to populations affected by humanitarian emergencies? A qualitative evidence synthesis. Glob Ment Health 2018; 5: e21 10.1017/gmh.2018.12 PMC6036649 29997893 · DOI
  45. [73]Kneale D, Thomas J, Bangpan M, et al Conceptualising causal pathways in systematic reviews of international development interventions through adopting a causal chain analysis approach. J Dev Effect 2018; 10: 422– 37. 10.1080/19439342.2018.1530278 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bangpan, M., Felix, L., & Dickson, K.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Portsmouth (GB)
Corresponding author
Bangpan, Mukdarut
Venue
BMJ Global Health
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2019-10
Volume
4
Issue
5
Pages
e001484
ISSN
2059-7908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2978235473
Cited by
108
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ Global Health (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Humanitarian Evidence Programme funded by the UK Department for International Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
mental health and psychosocial support, humanitarian crisis, adults, post-traumatic stress disorder, cognitive behavioral therapy, narrative exposure therapy, psychotherapy, low- and middle-income countries, mental health interventions, disaster mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review