Cited by 174Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesObsessive-Compulsive Spectrum DisordersPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The effects of safety behaviors on the fear of contamination: An experimental investigation

Deacon, Brett, Maack, Danielle J.·2008·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The strategies used by anxious individuals to prevent feared outcomes, known as safety behaviors, are thought to maintain pathological anxiety by preventing the disconfirmation of inaccurate threat beliefs. However, it is possible that safety behaviors might also contribute to the development and exacerbation of anxiety symptoms. The present study tested this notion in a sample of undergraduate participants with either low (n=30) or high (n=26) levels of contamination fear. After a week-long baseline period, participants spent 1 week engaging in a clinically representative array of contamination-related safety behaviors on a daily basis, followed by a second baseline period. Subsequent to the safety behavior manipulation, participants evidenced statistically significant increases in threat overestimation, contamination fear symptoms, and emotional and avoidant responses to three contamination-related behavioral avoidance tasks (BATs). In contrast, anxiety and depressive symptoms remained stable. The magnitude of change in contamination concerns was equivalent among participants in both contamination fear groups. Our findings suggest that contamination-related safety behaviors elicit a modest and specific increase in the fear of contamination. Possible mechanisms for this effect, as well as implications for the role of safety behaviors in the psychopathology of anxiety disorders, are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2008.01.010

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deacon, B., & Maack, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Wyoming (US)
Corresponding author
Deacon, Brett
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
537-547
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076565367
Cited by
174
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
safety behavior, fear of contamination, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, behavioral avoidance, anxiety maintenance, threat beliefs, anxiety disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anxiety, Attitude to Health, Avoidance Learning, Fear, Female, Humans, Hygiene, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review