Cited by 83Eating Disorders and BehaviorsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Intolerance of uncertainty in eating disorders: an update on the field

Kesby, Alice, Maguire, Sarah, Brownlow, Rachel, Grisham, Jessica R.·2017·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

Pathological fear and anxiety regarding food, eating, weight and body shape are at the core of eating disorder (ED) psychopathology. To manage anxiety, patients develop complicated repertoires of ritualistic and repetitive behaviours, which can lead to total functional impairment. Yet the cognitive processes underlying anxiety, fear, and anxiety-driven behaviours in EDs remain poorly understood. Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is defined as a tendency to react negatively on an emotional, cognitive, and behavioural level to uncertain situations and events. There is substantial evidence that IU is a transdiagnostic process that contributes to the maintenance of anxiety disorders; however, IU may also be relevant to the understanding and treatment of EDs. The current review summarises the growing literature examining IU in relation to ED symptoms, including restriction, bingeing, purging, ritualised behaviours, reassurance-seeking and body checking. Extending from the obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and anxiety disorder literature, we propose that IU provides a novel theoretical and clinical framework from which to understand the anxiety, fixation with rules and rituals, and the cognitively rigid profile that is characteristic of ED presentations. We conclude with suggestions for future research, and discuss IU as a potential treatment target for core features of EDs and comorbid symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2017.07.002

Cites

151 of 151 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kesby, A., Maguire, S., Brownlow, R., & Grisham, J. R.
Affiliations
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Kesby, Alice
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
56
Pages
94-105
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2728447522
Cited by
83
References
150
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
intolerance of uncertainty, eating disorders, anxiety, obsessive-compulsive symptoms, ritual behavior, reassurance seeking, body checking, transdiagnostic mechanisms, treatment goals, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Anxiety Disorders, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Humans, Uncertainty

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review