Cited by 166Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFace Recognition and PerceptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Gaze direction differentially affects avoidance tendencies to happy and angry faces in socially anxious individuals

Open access
Roelofs, Karin, Putman, Peter, Schouten, Sonja, Lange, Wolf-Gero, Volman, Inge, Rinck, Mike·2010·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates that eye gaze direction affects the processing of emotional faces in anxious individuals. However, the effects of eye gaze direction on the behavioral responses elicited by emotional faces, such as avoidance behavior, remain largely unexplored. We administered an Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) in high (HSA) and low socially anxious (LSA) individuals. All participants responded to photographs of angry, happy and neutral faces (presented with direct and averted gaze), by either pushing a joystick away from them (avoidance) or pulling it towards them (approach). Compared to LSA, HSA were faster in avoiding than approaching angry faces. Most crucially, this avoidance tendency was only present when the perceived anger was directed towards the subject (direct gaze) and not when the gaze of the face-stimulus was averted. In contrast, HSA individuals tended to avoid happy faces irrespectively of gaze direction. Neutral faces elicited no approach-avoidance tendencies. Thus avoidance of angry faces in social anxiety as measured by AA-tasks reflects avoidance of subject-directed anger and not of negative stimuli in general. In addition, although both anger and joy are considered to reflect approach-related emotions, gaze direction did not affect HSA's avoidance of happy faces, suggesting differential mechanisms affecting responses to happy and angry faces in social anxiety.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2009.11.008

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The present findings may lend support for potential therapeutic benefits of OT for psychiatric disorders such as social anxiety and autism exhibiting altered approach/avoidance towards social stimuli.

    “Moreover, within this context, the present findings may lend support for potential therapeutic benefits of OT for psychiatric disorders such as social anxiety and autism exhibiting altered approach/avoidance towards social stimuli (Heuer et al., 2007; Davis et al., 2010; Roelofs et al., 2010; Tanaka and Sung, 2016).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Marks, I. M. (1987). Fears, phobias and rituals. Panic, anxiety and other disorders. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 682 pp.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roelofs, K., Putman, P., Schouten, S., Lange, W.-G., Volman, I., & Rinck, M.
Affiliations
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
290-294
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151516677
Cited by
166
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (#452-07-008)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
social anxiety, gaze direction, emotional face processing, approach-avoidance behavior, angry faces, happy faces, averted gaze, direct gaze, threat perception
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Anger, Anxiety Disorders, Eye Movements, Facial Expression, Female, Happiness, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Photic Stimulation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reaction Time, Social Behavior, Task Performance and Analysis, Visual Perception, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review