Cited by 352Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A randomised controlled trial of a brief online mindfulness-based intervention

Open access

Abstract

Objectives There is growing evidence that mindfulness has positive consequences for both psychological and physical health in both clinical and non-clinical populations. The potential benefits of mindfulness underpin a range of therapeutic intervention approaches designed to increase mindfulness in both clinical and community contexts. Self-guided mindfulness-based interventions may be a way to increase access to the benefits of mindfulness. This study explored whether a brief, online, mindfulness-based intervention can increase mindfulness and reduce perceived stress and anxiety/depression symptoms within a student population.Method One hundred and four students were randomly allocated to either immediately start a two-week, self-guided, online, mindfulness-based intervention or a wait-list control. Measures of mindfulness, perceived stress and anxiety/depression were administered before and after the intervention period.Results Intention to treat analysis identified significant group by time interactions for mindfulness skills, perceived stress and anxiety/depression symptoms. Participation in the intervention was associated with significant improvements in all measured domains, where no significant changes on these measures were found for the control group.Conclusions This provides evidence in support of the feasibility and effectiveness of shorter self-guided mindfulness-based interventions. The limitations and implications of this study for clinical practice are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2013.06.003

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 352

Metadata

Authors
Cavanagh, K., Strauss, C., Cicconi, F., Griffiths, N., Wyper, A., & Jones, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Sussex (GB)
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Canterbury Christ Church University (GB)
Corresponding author
Cavanagh, Kate
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-09
Volume
51
Issue
9
Pages
573-578
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2148707744
Cited by
350
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16
FWCI
23.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness-based interventions, online intervention, self-guided intervention, brief intervention, mindfulness skills, perceived stress, anxiety, depression, university students, feasibility
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Stress, Psychological, Students, Therapy, Computer-Assisted, Treatment Outcome, Internet, Young Adult, Intention to Treat Analysis, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review