Cited by 94Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and DisordersChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

An examination of avoidance in major depression in comparison to social anxiety disorder

Ottenbreit, Nicole D., Dobson, Keith S., Quigley, Leanne·2014·Behaviour Research and Therapy

Abstract

The construct of avoidance has begun to receive attention in theoretical models and empirical investigations of depression. However, little is known about relative levels of avoidance across diagnostic categories or about the relationships between avoidance and other correlates of depression. The present study compared levels of avoidance across groups of depressed women without social anxiety disorder (MDD without SAD), depressed women with social anxiety disorder (MDD with SAD), women with social anxiety disorder (SAD), and nonclinical women, and investigated the relationships among avoidance, and sociotropy and autonomy, rumination, and negative and positive problem orientations within the clinically depressed group. Avoidance was found to be significantly higher in all clinical groups relative to the nonclinical group of women, and highest in the comorbid MDD with SAD group. Avoidance showed significant positive relationships with sociotropy, autonomy, rumination, and negative problem orientation, and a significant negative relationship with positive problem orientation within the overall sample of depressed women. These results suggest that avoidance should be given greater consideration in psychosocial models of depression and point to several important directions for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.brat.2014.03.005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Frequent avoidance of perceived unpleasant conditions by depressed individuals results in limited exposure to positively-reinforced behaviors and social activities, increasing the risk of recurrence.

    “Ferster (1973) suggested that avoidance plays a role in which frequent avoidance of perceived unpleasant conditions by depressed individuals results in limited exposure to positively-reinforced behaviors and social activities [52, 53] hence increasing the risk of recurrence.”

    From Predictors of recurrence of major depressive disorder (2020) · cites this paper as [53]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ottenbreit, N. D., Dobson, K. S., & Quigley, L.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Health Services (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Corresponding author
Dobson, Keith S.
Venue
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-05
Volume
56
Pages
82-90
ISSN
0005-7967 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030372995
Cited by
94
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1
FWCI
10.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
avoidance, major depressive disorder, social anxiety disorder, comorbidities, women, sociotropy, autonomy, rumination, problem orientation
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Problem Solving, Thinking, Case-Control Studies, Personal Autonomy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review